查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 臺灣地區家庭背景對就讀公/私立學校與受教育年數的影響:並檢證文化資本論財務資本論社會資本論之適用性
- 臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性
- 學校、教師、家長與學生特質對原漢學業成就的影響--以臺東縣國小為例
- 父母對子女學習的影響--家庭資源之探討
- 不同社經背景小學生的數學科學業成就、文化資本、經濟暨財務資本、及社會資本關係之差異
- 文化資本、社會資本、財務資本與原住民學生學業成就關係之文獻探討
- 國中身心障礙學生家庭社經地位、社會資本、文化資本、財務資本與學習成果之關係研究
- 臺灣國三生原漢族群與其他出身背景透過社會資本、文化資本、財務資本對學業成就之影響
- 誰在決定我的未來?教育資源還是教育抱負對學生運動員生涯發展的影響
- 影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣地區家庭背景對就讀公/私立學校與受教育年數的影響:並檢證文化資本論財務資本論社會資本論之適用性=The Influence of Background Factors on Attending Public or Private Schools and on Years of Education in Taiwan Area: To Explore the Adaptation of Cultural, Financial, and Social Capital |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭燿男; 陳怡靖; | 書刊名 | 國民教育研究學報 |
卷 期 | 6 2000.06[民89.06] |
頁 次 | 頁103-140 |
分類號 | 526.1 |
關鍵詞 | 文化資本; 社會資本; 財務資本; 聯考; 家庭背景; 公私立高中; Cultural capital; Social capital; Financial capital; Entrance examination; Family background; Public or private senior high schools; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以家庭背景影響就公私立高中與受教育年數為研究主軸,雖然過去研究支持就讀公私立高中與受教育年數教育機會的不均等性,但是為何越是需要受照顧的家庭及其下一代,越是享受不到公立學校的資源呢?為何家庭背景越好考上公立高中的比率越高?卻是無進一步的研究,本文依據文獻探討假是否就是文化資本、社會資本、財務資本為中心所形成的影響,這是本研究的重點,及與過去研究不同之處。 本研究結果獲得以下幾點結論:就讀公立學校的人,其未來受教育年數較就讀私立學校者多0.83年。男女、省籍在就讀公私立學校上差異達到顯著,但是當控制其他變項的影響後,以迴歸分析來看性別差異對於就讀公私立學校的影響並不顯著。父親教育程度越高,子女就讀公立學校的比率越高。越都市化地區,越多人就讀私立學校。出生年次越晚(越年輕),就讀私立學校的情形較普遍。當控制其他變項的影響後,居住地區、父親教育、出生年次等三個背景變項達到顯著,也就是說這三個變項影響升學公立或私立學校。背景變項透過社會資本、文化資本、財務資本對於影響升學公私立學校而言,應不是重要的中介。就背景變項與教育年數而言,社會資本、財務資本是父親教育與兄弟姊妹數的中介;文化資本是客家人的中介。 由本研究結果發現背景變項透過社會資本、文化資本、財務資本對於影響升學公私立學校而言,應不是重要的中介。可能是因為臺灣地區有聯考的把關,使得社會資植、文化資本、財務資本不利的人。,只要努力仍然有升學公立學校的機會,並進一步升大學。因此,這是本研究獲得「聯考」在臺灣地區仍然是廣大民眾較為相信具有公平的直接或間接的參考結果,同時也是廣大民眾不喜歡聯考但是卻相信聯考的原因之一。同時也解釋了背景變項父親教育與兄弟姊妹數影響受教育年數是透過社會資植、財務資本為中介;客家人是透過文化資本為中介。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of the study is to explore the influence of family background on attending public or private senior high schools and years of education. Most past research supported the inequality of educational opportunity on attending public or private schools and years of education. But why the more a family and its members need to be taken care of, the more they can not share the resources of public schools? Why the rate of attending public schools continues growing, especially when these students come from a better family? There is no further study about these problems. Unlike past research, the study focuses on the assumption that these problems are influenced by intermediates such as cultural, social, and financial capital. The study reaches some conclusions. People attending public schools have extra 0.83 years of education than those who go into private schools. Owing to the sex and provincialism, the difference of attending public or private schools will become the greatest. According to the regression analyses, the sex difference has less influence on attending public or private schools if the influence of other variables is controlled. The more a father has a higher extent of education, the more the rate his children attend public schools is much more higher. If people live in a modernized zone or born late (more younger), it seems more common for them to attend private schools. When other variables are controlled, these three variables, living zone, father's education, the year of birth, will influence attending public or private schools the most. Background variables with social, cultural, and financial capital are not the most influencial intermediates on attending public or private schools. When it comes to background variables and years of education, social and financial capital are intermediates of father's education and members of brothers and sisters; cultural capital is Hakka's intermediate. The study shows that background variables with social, cultural, and financial capital are not the most essential intermediates on going into public or private schools. Since having the door of Entrance Examination in Taiwan area, those who have poor social, cultural, or financial capital still can attend public schools and universities as long as they make great efforts. Therefore, the study indicates that one of reasons most people don't like "Entrance Examination" but believe in it is the direct or indirect fairness of Entrance Examination. The study also gives an explanation that background variables such as father's education and numbers of brothers and sisters can have the influence on years of education through social and financial capital as intermediates. Besides, the study also shows that Hakka's intermediate is the cultural capital. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。