查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 為臺灣傳播研究另闢蹊徑?:傳播史研究與研究途徑=The Study and Approaches of Communication History in the Midst of a Paradigm Shift in Taiwan's Communication Studies |
---|---|
作 者 | 林麗雲; | 書刊名 | 新聞學研究 |
卷 期 | 63 2000.04[民89.04] |
頁 次 | 頁35-54 |
專 輯 | 傳播與歷史 |
分類號 | 890 |
關鍵詞 | 傳播研究典範; 傳播史; 研究方法; 歷史社會學; Communication research paradigm; Communication history; Methodology; Historical sociology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 數十年來,台灣的傳播研究深受美國主流典範的影響。這個典範偏重效果及微觀的分析而忽略結構及鉅觀的部份,因此無法充分解釋台灣社會變遷中的傳播現象。在此「非常時期」(the period of anomaly)──也就是舊典範面臨危機而新典範尚未成型之際──本文指出,面對傳播環境中的變遷與挑戰,傳播史研究是不可或缺的領域,因為史學研究中鉅觀及動態的分析,有助於觀照傳播體制的過去、現在與未來,以及建構根植於本土的理論架構。接著,本文討論未來進行傳播史研究時可能採用的幾種途徑──歷史主義的、客觀的 與解釋的 ──,並分析它們的優點與限制。本文的目的在於拋磚引玉,期盼有更多的人共同來耕耘這片重要而尚待努力開發的領域。 |
英文摘要 | Taiwan's communication research has long been influenced by the dominant researchparadigm in the US. This paradigm, focusing on micro-level analysis and ignoring the macro and structural analysis, can not fully answer the communication problems in Taiwan's social transition. At the present "period of anomaly" i. e. the period when the old paradigm is in crisis but a new one has not yet come, this paper suggests that historical studies would be indispensable in meeting changes and challenges in the communication system. The reason is that a holistic and historical analysis can shed light on the historical trend for the particular context. The paper further discusses the main historical approaches--the historicist, objective and interpretative ones--and their implications for future research. The discussion here aims to inspire and to invite people to come to this important but largely unexplored field in communication studies. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。