頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 革命與反革命--「清黨」再思考=Revolution, Counterrevolution, and the Purge of the Communists in the Nationalist China, 1927-1928 |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃金麟; | 書刊名 | 新史學 |
卷 期 | 11:1 2000.03[民89.03] |
頁 次 | 頁99-147 |
分類號 | 628.4 |
關鍵詞 | 清黨; 革命; 反革命; 論述; 符號暴力; Party purge; Revolution; Counterrevolution; Discourse; Symbolic violence; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 如果說革命是主導整個近代中國歷史發展的一個主要符碼,也是孫中山等人力以赴的生願,發生於一九二七年四月的清黨運動,則具體揭露了革命本身所意含的流變與任意趨性。孫中山等人容或有一個不得不的理由,將「聯俄容共」視為國民革命的重要步驟,但這個勉強的包容卻也使得這場革救本身就包含了一個反革命的成份。在過去國共的歷史書寫中,清黨不是被頌揚為一個護黨救的運動,就是被該寫為一個罪不可赦的反革命政變。這種書寫忽略了「反共」這個面向其實並不足以表徵清黨的所有面貌。南京民黨中央將清黨對象大規模擴及於非共產黨人士,和對素以反共著稱的上海中央的打壓,對反對「聯俄容共」最力的國家主義派的強力箝制等,都說明清黨並不是一個單純的清共首分共運動。透過本文的討論,作者希望能夠對清黨的一些特定歷史面貌有所還原,同時證示武力與符號暴力所以成為南京政權無法擺脫的統制形式的原因。 |
英文摘要 | This article argues that the April 1927 purge of the Communists was not just a patriotic movement or a coup d'etat, as many historians have described. The occurrence of the purge revealed that the revolution, initiated by Sun Yet-sen in the early 1920s to bring down the warlords and the imperial forces in China, contained in itself a counterrevolutionary disposition. This development not only resulted in the revolution becoming arbitrary and indefinable in character, but also distanced the revolutionary activity from the desires of the people. An inquiry of the political, military, and cultural arbitrariness that consisted in purge in particular, and the revolution in general, will show why and how violence played so central a part to the survival of the Nanking Regime in the late 1920s. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。