查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 發展型「國家」或發展型國家「理論」的終結﹖=The End of Developmental State or the End of the Theory of Developmental State﹖ |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄭為元; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 34 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-68 |
專 輯 | 國家與全球化專題 |
分類號 | 571.1 |
關鍵詞 | 發展型國家; 發展中國家; 新興工業國家; 發展策略; 經濟政策; Developmental state; Developing countries; Newly industrializing countries; Developmental strategies; Economic policies; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 東亞金融風暴使得發展型「國家」和「理論」都面臨終結的危機。發展型國 家概念充滿許多視為當然的命題,缺乏系統和反省。本文分析發展型國家的各命 題有普遍性、階段性、權變性、歷史性和特殊性等不同屬性。在以區域研究文獻 為依據,做比較分析後,筆者置疑許多命題在觀念上或經驗上的有效性。對國家 自主、技術官僚、歷史文化因素的概化、東亞經驗複製、鑲嵌,乃至「發展」等, 筆者提出一些見解。全球化使得國家在發展的功能更為吃重。終結的是「家長式」 的領導和「重商主義」式的發展策略。 |
英文摘要 | After the East Asian financial crisis of 1997, both the developmental state and the theory of the developmental state seem out of mode. The theory of developmental state consists of many propositions, which are unsystematic, contradictory, and taken for granted. This study grouped these propostions into five categories: universal, developmental, expedient, historical, and specific. This author checked the empirical bases of these propositions with literature from area studies. Results show many well-known propositons and concepts are problematic and subject to reconsideration. The author presented new interpretations for state autonomy, technocrats, generalization of historical and cultural factors, embeddedness, and even the meaning of development. In conclusion, developmental state's roles are still and even more critical in globalization. The only passing is the authoritarian and neomerchantialist developmental strategy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。