頁籤選單縮合
題名 | How to Enhance the Performance of Police Forces: Will the Community Policing Policy Work﹖=如何提昇警政效率--社區警察制度有效嗎﹖ |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 林正弘; | 書刊名 | 中央警察大學學報 |
卷期 | 35 1999.09[民88.09] |
頁次 | 頁145-156 |
分類號 | 575.84 |
關鍵詞 | 警政效率; 社區警察; Police; Police forces; Community policing; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 過去二十年來,傳統階層化的警察機關,一直被批評其對預防與打擊犯罪並無太 大功效,因此學者與實務界人士提出了許多改革警政制度,以提昇效率之政策, 這些政策包括:減少不必要之警力、增加街頭巡邏之警力和將部份警察工作委由 私人機關代執行。本文指出,這些策略無法同時實現公共政策之兩項基本目標; 效率與公平。另一方面,部份研究警政革新之人士提出一項授予基層員警更多自 主權的警政革新政策:社區警察制度。實證資料顯示,此項政策對於減少犯罪率, 與降低民眾對於犯罪之恐懼有一定的效用,同時此制度亦有其它優點。然而理論 上,給予基層員警執行任務時較大之自由裁量空間,可能增加員警濫用此權力之 機率,而使得其工作表現與執勤結果變得更不可靠。雖然如此,作者仍然認為一 個規劃與執行完善的社區警察制度,將會大幅增加員警與轄區居民互動的次數與 深度。此互動的模式將促使該員警更加瞭解並回應民眾的期待與需求,其自由裁 量權力反因而受到更實際之監督與控制。 |
英文摘要 | Since the traditional hierarchical police agencies have been criticized for their incapability in preventing and fighting crime in the past two decades, several approaches intended to enhance police efficiency have been proposed. These suggestions include downsizing, expending and privatizing police forces. This study argues that these three alternatives could not achieve both efficiency and equity simultaneously. On the other hand. Some police reformers proposed a decentralized policing policy: community policing. Empirical evidence reveals the potential of this policy in decreasing public fear of crime and crime rate. There are still several benefits for adopting this approach. But community policing would increase police officers' discretion which could causes them to be less accountable. The author suggests that a well implemented community policing policy will greatly increase the interactions among officers and community members, which, in turn, can serve as an external control over officers' discretion. Thus, police officers will be less anonymous and more accountable to community. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。