查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 「皇唐玉牒」編撰者之重新檢討=A Re-Inquiry Into the Issue of the Compilers of the T'ang Imperial Genealogy |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 李浩; | 書刊名 | 故宮學術季刊 |
卷期 | 16:4 民88.夏 |
頁次 | 頁49-56+左3 |
分類號 | 820.9041 |
關鍵詞 | 皇唐玉牒; 元和姓纂; 編撰者; 林贊; 林寶; The T'ang Imperial Genealogy; A collection of surnames from the Yuan-ho Reign; Compiler; Lin Tsan; Lin Pao; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 《皇唐玉牒》是唐代皇家譜牒文獻,已佚,唐宋典籍對該書多有記載,但載錄又頗多矛盾,其中尤以編撰者的爭論引人注目。編者之一李衢似無異辭,但另一編者究竟是林贊,還是林寶,抑或「贊」是「寶」之訛字,歧說紛紛。本文對岑仲勉、余嘉錫等人的觀點提出商榷,指出否定林贊的存在,或以為「贊」是「寶」之訛字,與修《玉牒》者即《元和姓纂》的編者林寶,似嫌證據不足,站不住腳。 |
英文摘要 | Although the original text has been lost, The T'ang Imperial Genealogy has served as a reference source for many T'ang and Sung texts and records, which often run in contradiction to their quotations. The most argued point is that of authorship. It is generally agreed that Li Ch'u was one of the compilers, but it is under heated discussion as to whether the other compiler was Lin Tsan or Lin Pao, or even wheteher the character for "Tsan" was simply a transcription error for "Pao." This article presents a different version that runs contrary to the works by Ts'en Chung-mien and Yu Chia-hsi--pointing out that merely proving the non-existence of Lin Tsan or proving the fact that the character "Tsan" is an error for "Pao" does not, with sufficient historical back-up, lead to the conclusion that the author of The T'ang Imperial Genealogy is identical with the author Lin Pao of A Collection of Surnames from the Yuan-ho Reign. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。