查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Mosston's直接教學形式對網球技術教學效果之研究=A Study of Mosston's Reproduction on Teaching Tennis Skills |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄧正忠; | 書刊名 | 宜蘭技術學報 |
卷 期 | 2 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁83-97 |
分類號 | 528.953 |
關鍵詞 | 練習式; 互惠式; 包含式; The Practice style; The reciprocal style; The inclusion style; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究的目的在驗證 Mosston的教學光譜直接教學學群中之練習式、互惠式及包 含式的教學理論,以國立宜蘭技術學院八十六學年度第一學期選修體育課網球興趣分組的七 十五位學生為受試者,以正、反手拍對牆擊球及左、右邊發球項目為教學內容,經十五週的 實驗教學及二週後再舉行保留測驗,所得各項資料再以t檢定、單因子變異數分析等統計方 法探討直接教學群集中的練習式、包含式及互惠式等三種形式教學法的教學效果及保留學習 效果的差異, 其結果如下: 1.Mosston 的教學光譜中的直接教學群集 (練習式、互惠式及 包含式等教學法 ) 為一有效之教學理論。 2. 練習式、互惠式及包含式等教學法在網球正 、反拍對牆擊球及左、右邊發球的技術學習效果上,都達到統計上的顯著差異 (P<.05)。顯 示上述教學法對學習網球基本技術都能達到預期的學習效果,而在這三種教學法在對正、反 拍對牆擊球及左、右邊發球的技術的學習上,互惠式教學法優於包含式教學法,在反拍對牆 擊球的學習技術上,練習式教學法優於包含式教學法。 3. 練習法、互惠式、包含式等三種 教學方式在網球技術教學中教學保留效果,以互惠式教學法最佳,在正、反拍對牆擊球及左 、右邊發球的技術的學習上都具有保留效果,而練習式教學法僅在正、反拍對牆擊球的技術 學習上具有保留效果,反觀包含式教學法在正、反拍對牆擊球及左、右邊發球的技術的學習 上都不具有保留效果。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of the study was to test the teaching effectiveness of the Practice Style, the Reciprocal Style, and the Inclusion Style in Mosston's Reproduction. Seventy-five students in National I-Lan Institute of Technology Who took elective tennis courses in the first semester of 1997 were used as subjects. The experiment included hitting the ball on the wall with both forehand and backhand, and service on the right or left side with the duration of fifteen weeks. The reservation test was held in two weeks. Statistical methods were used to analyze the data and test of variances. It was found: 1、 Mosston's Reproduction, including the Practice Style, the Reciprocal Style, and the Inclusion Style was an effective way of teaching. 2、The Practice Style, the Reciprocal Style, and the Inclusion Style of skill learning indicated significant effects (p<.05) in hitting the ball on the wall with both forehand and backhand, and service on the right or left side. Among the three teaching methods, the Reciprocal Style. Was more effective than the Inclusion Style in learning the skills of hitting the ball on the wall with both forehand and backhand, and service on the right or left side; as to learning the skill of hitting the ball on the wall with forehand and backhand, the Practice Style was better than the Inclusion Style. 3、 Among the three teaching methods:the Practice Style, the Reciprocal Style, and the Inclusion Style, in the reservation effects of tennis skill teaching, the Reciprocal Style was the most effective with the reservation effects in achieving the skills of hitting the ball on the wall with forehand and backhand and service on the right and left side; the Practice Style only caused the reservation effect in learning the skill of hitting the ball on the wall with forehand and backhand; as to the Inclusion Style with no reservation effects in learning neither the skill of hitting the ball on the wall with forehand and backhand nor the skill of service on the right or left side. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。