頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 勞思光與新儒家=Lao Sze-Kwang and Neo-Confucianists |
---|---|
作者 | 馮耀明; Fung, Yiu Ming; |
期刊 | 哲學與文化 |
出版日期 | 19990800 |
卷期 | 26:8=303 1999.08[民88.08] |
頁次 | 頁712-720+788 |
分類號 | 128 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 主體性; 天人合一; 天道論; 本性論; 道德形上學; 氣質命定論; 新儒家; Subjectivity; Unity of heaven and man; Theory of tien-tao; Theory of original essence; Moral metaphysics; Chi-chih determinism; Neo-Confucianism; |
中文摘要 | 當代新儒家與勞思光雖有共同的「人文關懷」,但二者對儒學的觀點卻有極大的差異。勞思光並不認同新儒家的「道德形上學」的構想,認為傳統的「天道論」、「本性論」以至當代的「道德形上學」,都會偏離傳統「心性工夫論」的正路,使儒學所強調的「主體性」無由確立。本文的目的,旨在分辨勞思光與新儒家所展示的兩條不同的路向,及揭示宇宙化的道德觀念的困境。 |
英文摘要 | Although Contemporary Neo-Confucianists and Lao Sze-Kwang share the same kind of “humanistic concern”, they have different views on Confucianism. Lao Sze- Kwang does not agree with the Neo-Confucianists' idea of “moral metaphysics”. He thinks that the traditional “theory of Tieh-Tao”, “theory of Original Essence”, and the modern “moral metaphysics” are not on the right track, and the Confucian “subjectivity” cannot be established in them. This paper aims at distinguishing two different ways of developing Confucianism between Lao Sze-Kwang and Neo-Confucianists, and disclosing the predicament of the globalization of moral ideas. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。