查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 讀慧海「頓悟入道要門論」隨記=An Essay on Reading Hui-hai's Gateway to The Sudden Enlightenment to Truth |
---|---|
作 者 | 樓宇烈; | 書刊名 | 中華佛學學報 |
卷 期 | 12 1999.07[民88.07] |
頁 次 | 頁53-68 |
分類號 | 226.6 |
關鍵詞 | 慧海; 頓悟; 藉教明宗; 神會; 般若性空; Hui-hai; Sudden enlightenment; The employment of classical doctrines to clarify the sectarian motif; Shen-hui; Emptiness of self-nature in Prajna; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文由讀慧海(頓悟入道要門論) 而引發出對禪宗南宗頓悟法門理解中存在的一 些問題的思考。如禪宗頓悟法門與經典的關係問題,文章認為在五家禪分門以前,禪宗大師 們都是很重視以經典來證頓悟法門的,雖不必說「藉教悟宗」,但「藉教明宗」是不辯的事 實。又如,自宗密以後,一般都比較注意馬祖道一洪州宗與神會荷澤宗之間的差異,然從慧 海的著作中看,兩者有許多相同之處,值得進一步研究。再如,不少禪宗思想研究者,把禪 宗南宗以心性為本體思想詮釋為「真常唯心」說,文章認為,從慧能到神會到道一、慧海、 黃檗希運,乃至五家以後的主要禪宗大師,都是堅持般若性空、中觀八不中道立場的。 |
英文摘要 | Based on the reading of Hui-hai's Gateway To The Sudden Enlightenment To Truth, this article considers some issues in the understanding of gateways to sudden enlightenment in the Southern Zen tradition. Regarding the relationship between Zen gateways to sudden enlightenment and the Buddhist classics, the article maintains that before Zen was divided into five sects, the Zen masters relied heavily upon the classics to interpret the ways of sudden enlightenment, and it was a mere fact that the classical doctrines were employed to clarify the sectarian motif, though not to perceive it. Down from Tsung-rni, much attention has been paid to the differences between Hong-zhou Sect led by Ma-zu Dao-yi and He-ze Sect led by Shen-xiu. But according to the writings of Hui-hai, they share more in common than ever acknowledged. Furthermore, many scholars of Zen thought tend to interpret the idea of entity of mind in Southern Zen tradition as a doctrine that mind alone is perpetual reality. But this article suggests, rather, that prominent Zen masters such as Hui-neng, Ma-zu Dao-yi, Hui-hai, Xi-yun of Huang-bo Temple, and those after the five sects, all hold to the position of emptiness of self-nature in Prajna and the middle way of eight negations in the Madhyamika. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。