頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 德、荷水利會之研究=The Research of the Water Boards in Germany and the Netherlands |
---|---|
作 者 | 郭玲惠; 林鎮洋; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 24 1999.07[民88.07] |
頁 次 | 頁349-376 |
分類號 | 431.55 |
關鍵詞 | 水利會; 水議會; 農田水利會; 水利小組; Water board; General council; Irrigation association; Irrigation group; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 土地及水是國家兩項極為珍貴的資源,是經過數千萬年自然力的作用而形成,得 來不易,但要失去則可發生於短時之間,且無法再生或替代,因此,對於國土及水資源的規 劃利用,應以最嚴肅及虔誠的態度來處理。但是近年來,隨著我國政治,經濟,社會各方面 的快速發展,部分生態環境遭受破壞,土地資源的分配呈現扭曲現象,加以臺灣地區自然條 件欠佳,在全球氣候變遷之影響下,水資源的開發調配,保育利用及水患防治等各方面均遭 遇困難,致使臺灣地區常發生水患及缺水現象,造成人民及社會重大損失,更形成國家永續 發展的瓶頸。 為使水權分配符合「公共財」的合理管理,可參考荷蘭、德國等先進國家水利會之制度,建 立用水者、供水者及水資源保育者共同管理經營之水資源組織,並與我國制度相比較,在確 保家用及公共給水供應無虞下,推動水權及水利事業自由化,企業化及多角化。 德國、荷蘭及我國之(農田)水利會各有其組織及功能上之不同,雖有其特殊背景,然所欲 達到之促進(農業)經濟目的則一致。我國農田水利會成立至今已數十年,功能上亦面臨變 革,如何參考他國之制度,以做為我國之借鏡,實為當今不可忽略之課題,值得進一步深入 研究。本文乃拋磚引玉,藉由德國以及荷蘭兩國制度之簡介,呈現我國農田水利會組織以及 功能上諸多疑義,或可提供另一思惟之方向。 |
英文摘要 | Land and water are the most two valuable natural resources of the country. They are formed by the forces of nature, and they are hard to get, but it takes short time to lose them and they can't regenerate or substitute. Therefore we should take it seriously dealing with the plan and utilization of the territory of nation and the water resources. Recently the rapid development of politics, economics and society in our nation results in the ecocide and the distribution of land turn into twist. Due to the lack of natural conditions in Taiwan, under the influence of the global climate changes, all aspects of the protection, development, utilization of water and the precautions against the flood face difficulties-result in flood and lack of water. The situation has caused a lot of damages for people and in society, further more, it has become the bottleneck of the nation permanent development. The distribution of water resources related to the reasonable management of public property, we can set the organization of water resources managed by water-user, water-supplier and water-protector, to make sure the sufficient supply of family and public water, to promote the enterprises of water in freedom, industry and multipur-pose, with reference to the systems of water boards in Germany and the Netherlands. The water boards in Germany and the Netherlands and the Irrigation Associations in our country are different in organizations and functions. Although the backgrounds of their establishment are special, the aims to increase the (agricultural) economical benefits are the same. The Irrigation Associations have been existed for decades of years, their utilities should be reformed. It is necessary to compare other country's system to our country. This essay provides another way to think. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。