查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從「福利國家」到福利形構:東亞新興工業國家與經濟合作暨發展組織國家之比較=From "The Welfare State" to Welfare Configuration: The East Asian NICs and OECD Countries Compared |
---|---|
作 者 | 葉肅科; | 書刊名 | 東吳社會學報 |
卷 期 | 8 1999.03[民88.03] |
頁 次 | 頁155-194 |
分類號 | 548.2 |
關鍵詞 | 公民社會; 福利國家; 福利形構; 經濟合作暨發展組織; 東亞新興工業國家; Civil society; The welfare state; Welfare configuration; OECD; The east asian NICs; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「福利國家」 (thewelfarestate) 的概念是歷史的和文化的特有產物。自第二 次世界大戰以來,它已被研究了半個世紀,但它的定義卻相當不一致。許多分析「福利國家 」的探究取向,並未掌握國家與公民社會問的動態關係。本文認為:不同國家的福利發展, 最好是從檢證國家與公民社會問的福利供給關係來瞭解。忽視公民社會各部門(主要為市場 、志願部門與家庭)問的福利供給,將會對不同國家問的福利供給差異產生誇張意象。假如 我們想要瞭解東亞新興工業國家的福利發展,「福利國家」概念就額得不相關且不適用。「 福利形構」( welfare configuration )是較好的分析概念,因為, 它同時包含國家與公 民社會各部門問的福利供給。假如我們從福利供給觀點探討不同「類型」社會,那麼,我們 將會發現:不同的社會可能有不同的福利形構模型。不同福利形構是國家與公民社會間不同 運作關係的結果。和經濟合作暨發展組組國家比較起來,東亞新興工業國家的低國家福利介 入是弱勢公民社會和強勢國家權力運作的結果。這種公民社會力量的不同,是和這些新興工 業國家的歷史發展及其地緣政治位置有關。 |
英文摘要 | The concept of 'the welfare state' is historically and culturally specific. It has been studied for a half century since the Second World War, but definitions of it are inconsistent. Most analytical approaches to the development of 'the welfare state' do? not capture the dynamics of the relationship between the state and civil society. R is argued that different welfare development in different countries is best understood by examining the relationship between the state and civil society in relation to welfare provision. Neglecting the welfare provisions of various sectors ofcivil society (the market, the voluntary sector and the family) creates an exaggerated picture of the divergence between countries in the extent of their welfare provision. If we wish to understand the development of welfare in the East Asian NICs, the concept of 'the welfare state' is not relevant and not useful. A better analytic concept is that of 'welfare configuration'. It covers both the services provided by the state, and by various sectors of civil society. If we talk, from the welfare provision perspective, about different 'types' of societies, then we will find different models of welfare configurations existing in different societies. Different welfare configurations are a result of different relationships between the state and civil society. The low involvement of the state in welfare in the East Asian NICs in comparison with the OECD countries is a function of a weaker civil society and stronger state power in those countries. This differential strength of civil society related to the historical development of these nations and their geopolitical location. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。