查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 兒保過程中之社工決策
- 「寧缺毋濫」?「寧濫毋缺」?--兒童少年保護工作人員機構安置決策困境之研究
- 學校危機管理與危機決策的分析
- Budgetary Impact and Executive Budgetary Decision Making of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Under the Reagan Administration
- 組織決策嵌陷的陷溺與挽救歷程--個案研究取向
- 學校組織中校長決策行為之個案研究--以一所山區特偏國小為例
- 臺灣兒童少年安置機構政策與實務發展之探討
- 臺北縣推動「準用直轄市」策略之理性決策分析
- 自我決策理念應用於生涯探索教學之行動研究
- 高中體育班課綱訂定之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 兒保過程中之社工決策=CPS Workers' Decision-Making in Child Protection |
---|---|
作 者 | 余漢儀; | 書刊名 | 國立政治大學社會學報 |
卷 期 | 28 1998.10[民87.10] |
頁 次 | 頁81-116 |
分類號 | 547.2 |
關鍵詞 | 兒保虐待; 兒童保護; 個案研究; 決策; 家外安置; Child abuse; Child protection; Gase study; CPS worker; Decision-making; Out-of-home placement; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣地區對兒童虐待現象開始制度性的回應,可追溯到民國七十七年,主要來自 民間機構有計劃的倡導、推動。隨著全省兒少保通報熱線於民國八十四年底開辦後,首次 家訪調查改由社政(而非民間)單位出面,公權力介入家庭之機率隨之提高,政府兒保社工員 的研判依據,及對施虐的歸因就有更深遠的影響。本研究即以臺北縣、市及高雄市為例,綜 合 62 份問卷調查、113 份個案紀錄內容分析、及 12 位資深兒保社工員深入訪談及督導座 談等三種資料來源,試圖分析兒保社工員由接案時對通報資料的研判、調查、以及對施虐現 象歸因、處遇、結案等動態過程中, 她 / 他們的決策依據是什麼﹖其中倒底會有那些背後 機制﹖例如組織工作量、自我認定介入角色、對管教 / 體罰的看法等,是否會影響她 / 他 們的決策﹖ |
英文摘要 | The institutional response to the phenomena of child abuse in Taiwan could be traced back to 1988 when a private agency initiated series of child protection campaign. However, after the provincial central registry operated at the end of 1995, the probability of public intervention from CPS workers to the child-parent interaction within a family has been increased. Thus, how the CPS workers assess and attribute the maltreatment case has more impacts now. Combining 62 questionnaire data, content analyses of 113 case records and in- depth interview with 12 CPS workers of Taipei City/Hsien, Kaohsiung City, and CPS supervisor panel discussion, the author tries to explore the CPS workers' decision-making process regarding reports intake, investigation, assessment, treatment, and case termination. What are the CPS workers' attributions to child maltreatment ﹖ How will those mechanisms, such as workload, self-perception of the CPS role, attitudes to discipline vs. corporal punishment affect the workers' decisions ﹖ The implication of the research findings are thus followed Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Research strategy Ⅲ. CPS Workers' Decision-making from Survey Data Ⅳ. The Case of Taipei City CPS Workers Ⅴ. The Case of Taipei Hsien CPS workers Ⅵ. The Case of Kaohsiung City CPS workers Ⅶ. Out-of-Home Placement Decision-Making Ⅷ. Conclusion |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。