查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 利用氣相層析質譜儀檢測空氣中二硫化碳之研究
- 二硫化碳被動式採樣熱脫附氣相層析質譜儀分析方法研究
- 1,4-二氧陸圜空氣採樣分析方法建立
- 替代燃料對汽柴油引擎性能、毒性、污染與噪音特性分析之研究
- 大氣壓力游離式質譜儀在半導體工業之應用
- 半導體製程環境中空降分子污染物的特性與質譜分析
- Analysis, Formation and Inhibition of Heterocyclic Amines in Foods: An Overview
- 固相微量萃取法(SPME)在酒類揮發成份分析上之應用
- Rapid Analysis of Theaflavins by High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Mass Spectrometry
- 液化石油氣汽車引擎性能、毒性、污染與噪音特性分析及預測模式建立之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 利用氣相層析質譜儀檢測空氣中二硫化碳之研究=Using Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry to Detect Carbon Disulfide in Air |
---|---|
作者 | 吳麗珠; 石東生; | 書刊名 | 勞工安全衛生研究季刊 |
卷期 | 7:2 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁次 | 頁157-168 |
分類號 | 412.78 |
關鍵詞 | 二硫化碳; 空氣採樣; 質譜儀; Carbon disulfide; Air sampling; Mass spectrometry; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 作業環境空氣中二硫化碳之採樣分析,通常使用活性碳管連接乾燥管採樣,再以 甲苯脫附,使用氣相層析儀/火燄光度偵檢器(Gas Chromatography/Flame Photometric Detector, FPD) 進行分析。FPD 之感應並非線性關係,檢量線為曲線且線性範圍窄。 於大 量現場樣品分析時,常常需要稀釋樣品使落入檢量線範圍。本研究使用氣相層析質譜儀進行 二硫化碳分析,有效延伸檢測範圍,由 0.0013mg/mL 至 2.0 mg/mL, 約 1500 倍,解決原 有 FPD 方法檢量線範圍窄的困擾,增進大量樣品分析便捷性。 並於研究中發現二硫化碳以 甲苯脫附之脫附效率, 隨著濃度減少而降低。 脫附效率由 1.0mg/ 樣品的 95 %降至 0.10mg/ 樣品的 58 %。本研究同時嘗試以 Spherocarb 採樣管測試熱脫附方法,然因樣品 分析變異過大,儀器分析條件仍待改進。 |
英文摘要 | Air sampling and analysis method for carbon disulfide usually uses charcoal tube connected with dryer tube, desorbed by toluene and detected by Gas Chromatography/ Flame Photometric Detector (FPD). However the response of FPD for sulfur is not linear and calibration range is narrow (only 10 times). For field sample analysis, samples should be diluted to fit the calibration range. In this study Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry is utilized to detect carbon disulfide and its calibration range could be extended from 0.0013 mg/mL to 2.0 mg/mL (about 1500 times). Results indicated that the desorption efficiency for carbon disulfide extracted by toluene decreases as concentration decreases. The desorption efficiency for 1.0 mg/sample is 95%, however, its only 58% for 0.10 mg/sample. Spherocarb tube for carbon disulfide thermal desorption is also investigated. Unfortunately the analytical coefficient of variation is unacceptable (about 15%). The thermal desorption analysis condition still need improvement. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。