頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 地區開發計畫審議權責劃分之研究=Study on the Delimitation of Justifiable Authority for Land Development Scrutiny |
---|---|
作者 | 施鴻志; 周士雄; 鄭伊峻; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷期 | 23 1999.01[民88.01] |
頁次 | 頁289-310 |
分類號 | 445.1 |
關鍵詞 | 地區開發計畫; 審議機制; 決策衝突; Land development plan; Scruting mechanism; Decision conflict; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 計畫審議是一種群體決策,其過程容易產生認知差異或決策衝突。我國現行都市 與都市邊緣地區開發計畫審議工作由環境影響評估、水土保持與都市計畫等相關審議機制 分別進行,各有其所屬之審查組織、作業體制與規範,因此涉及之層面包括個別審議機制 之縱向權責劃分,以及相關審議機制間橫向關係之建立,其對於開發計畫之整個審議時程 皆有影響,而審議權責若能明確劃分,將可有效減低審查衝突、增進審查時效並建構合理 審議機制;本文利用德爾菲(Delphi)法進行實證分析,量測行政主管機關、專家委員、民 間顧問公司等不同背景之產官學界對於相關審議權責認知的差異與共識,經由兩回合專家 問卷之調查,使各方意見趨於統合、收斂與協調,以進行開發計畫相關審議權責之劃分, 促成審查作業機制間之共識及溝通協調,期能增進審查之時效,為未來國土計畫施行時, 建立效率審議機制研究之基礎。 |
英文摘要 | Plan scrutiny is a process of group decision-making in which the cognizance difference or decision conflict used to be easily resulted. According to current related laws and ordinances, a development plan should undergo the urban planning scrutiny, environment impact assessment, and soil conservation planning scrutiny. Such a scrutiny is complicated and therefore affects the planning efficiency. The definite division among different scrutiny systems is the key issue of reducing the conflict, improving the efficiency, and establishing the reasonable scrutiny mechanism. This study measures and analyzes cognitive attitude of three main sectors, the administrations, the expert commissions and the private consultants, toward scrutiny duty. After two rounds of the expert surveys, the opinions of these respondents had become converged and coordinated. By proceeding the division of the duty, it will contribute to agreement and coordination among these scrutiny systems and improve the efficiency of the scrutiny mechanism. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。