查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Comparison of Blood Pressure in Mature and Premature Neonates Using Direct and Indirect Methods of Measurement
- 臺中地區早產兒與足月兒出生時抗氧化營養狀況之比較
- 比較早產兒與足月兒母親之母育信心程度
- Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension in Preterm Infants with RDS
- 臺灣臺中地區早產兒與足月兒出生之紅血球細胞膜脂肪酸組成
- Serum Leptin Levels in Preterm, Healthy and Sick-Term Newborns
- A Comparison of the Leg Coordination Patterns of Preterm and Fullterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis
- Antenatal Steroids and Blood Pressure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
- Postnatal Brain Development Assessed by MRI: Comparing Preterm and Term Infants
- 足月兒和早產兒母親的產後憂鬱比較研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Comparison of Blood Pressure in Mature and Premature Neonates Using Direct and Indirect Methods of Measurement=足月兒與早產兒血壓以直接方法及間接方法測量之比較 |
---|---|
作者 | 劉靜雯; 陳淑貞; 黃碧桃; | 書刊名 | Clinical Neonatology |
卷期 | 5:2 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-6 |
分類號 | 417.517 |
關鍵詞 | 足月兒; 早產兒; 血壓; Direct intra-arterial blood pressure; Indirect oscillometric blood pressure; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | The aim of this study was to evaluate the correspondence of blood pressure (BP) measured using the direct intra-arterial method and indirect oscillometric monitor method. Twenty-three newborns with radial arterial catheters inserted were enrolled in this study. The gestational age (GA) ranged from 25-40 weeks and birth weight (BW) ranged from 700-3, 550 g. Direct BP was measured using radial arterial catheters. Indirect BP was concurrently measured from the contralateral forearm using and oscillometric monitor. The systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean BP (MBP) obtained using these two methods were analyzed. Although there was a significant correlation between the pairs of readings for SBP, DBP, and MBP (r=0.80, 0.70, 0.83, respectively, p<0.001 for all); the 95% confidence intervals for individual measurements exceeded 20 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, and 15mm Hg for MBP, SBP, DBP, and MBP obtained using the indirect method of measurement were significantly different from those obtained using te direct method (p<0.001 for all). The pressure differences and percentage of error were greater in groups of direct MBP>35 mm Hg, GA>32 weeks, and BW>1,500 g than in groups of direct MBP ≦ 35mm Hg, G ≦ 32 weeks, and BW ≦ 1,500 g. In conclusion, for MBP, the discrepancy found betwen these two methods of measurements was cilinically acceptable. For SBP and DBP, there was a large variability between these two methods. It is not appropriate to interpret the indirect oscillometric BP readings according to these available normative direct BP values. Direct BP monitoring should be used in tnewborns in intensive care. Cautious interpretation of oscillometric BP values for newborns in intensive care is mandatory. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。