頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 泥岩挖方坡面植生工法之土壤保育功效探討=Soil Conservation Effectiveness Comparison of Different Vegetation Engineering Methods for Cut Slopes in the Mudstone Area |
---|---|
作 者 | 郭張權; 林信輝; | 書刊名 | 水土保持學報 |
卷 期 | 30:3 1998.09[民87.09] |
頁 次 | 頁187-205 |
分類號 | 434.273 |
關鍵詞 | 泥岩; 植生工法; 土壤保育; Mudstone; Vegetation engineering; Soil conservation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究依所收集泥岩地區之學術研究理論與整治實務資料,選取目前泥岩地區主 要應用植生工法,試驗其植被覆蓋與土壤保育功效,期望能對於泥岩地區之植生復舊略盡 棉薄之力。試驗結果摘要如下: 1.混播植物材料試驗結果,山鹽菁、番石榴、青葙及賽芻豆生長較為良好,百喜草及百慕 達草因受青葙之被壓與競爭作用而生長較差,相思樹及黃野百合之初期生長較差。苗木 穴植試驗結果,鐵刀木及長穗木存活率最高,大葉桃花心木存活率最低。 2.不同植生工法之試驗結果,植生覆蓋度以植生帶法及擋土柵配合截留束法最高,肥束網 帶法最低。入侵植物數量及種類以擋土柵配合截留束法最多,而肥束網帶法最少。各植 生工法之保肥效果差異不大。 3.土壤保水力及土壤保育功效以擋土柵配合截留束法較佳,土壤硬度改良以肥束網帶法最 佳。 |
英文摘要 | Base on previous studies on soil and geological characteristics and successful field application for watershed treatment in the mudstone area, this study compares relative soil conservative effectiveness of different vegetation methods applied to test vegetative cover rates and in mudstone area. The results of this study are summarized as follows: 1.Trials of mixed sowing materials: Roxburgh Sumac, guava, Feather cockscomb and Siratro grow better Bahia grass and Bermuda grass grow poorly because of the competetion and the oppression by Feather cockscomb. On hole seedling plantation, Sianese Senna and Jamaica false-valarian grow well, but Honduras Mahogany doesn't. 2.Bioengineering methods: The methods of vegetation mat and embankment with interception bunch had higher vegetative cover rate than the others. The netted fertilizer bunch method is the worst. The method of embankment with interception bunch had the most of intrusive plants, and the netted fertilizer bunch method had the least. 3.The use of soil retaining wattle and interception bunch resulted in higher soil water content and better soil conservation effectiveness. Netted fertilizer bunch method provided the best soil hardness improvement. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。