查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從天臺判教的立場試論法藏「五教章」中對法華的批判=Fa-Tsang's Critique on the Lotus Sutra Contained in His Treatise on the Five Teachings: A Discussion from the Viewpoint of T'ien-T'ai Doxology |
---|---|
作 者 | 莊崑木; | 書刊名 | 法光學壇 |
卷 期 | 2 1998[民87.] |
頁 次 | 頁93-103 |
分類號 | 226.3 |
關鍵詞 | 天臺判教; 法藏; 五教章; 法華經; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 法藏大師在《五教章》中力闡別教一乘無盡華嚴的教義,可是他在建立別教一乘 時,主要的基礎卻是法華同教一乘,借用天臺法華的地方相當多。但《五教章》中對天臺圓 教中的法華經並未給予合理的定位,只是一筆帶過而已。而相形之下,天臺藏通別圓四教中 ,給予了華嚴明確的位置 -- 「別教」。因此智者大師在判教上可以說是比較嚴密而完整的 ,反觀法藏,其年代雖在智者大師之後,但未予天臺判教合理的融攝,讓法華無法合理地歸 到華嚴五教之中,顯出示出法藏判教系統的缺陷。本文主要是透過《五教章》提到法華及天 臺的地方,逐一檢討法藏的立論。 |
英文摘要 | Fa-tsang spent much energy on propagating the Special Teaching of the One Vehicle, the boundless Hua-yen Sutra, in his Treatise on the Five Teachings. He established the Special Teaching of the One Vehicle mainly on the basis of the Common Teaching of the One Vehicle of the Lotus Sutra availing himself frequently of T'ien-t'ai and Lotus Sutra concepts. Nevertheless, in his Treatise on the Five Teachings Fa-tsang mentioned the Lotus Sutra, which belongs to the Perfect Teaching ot the T'ien-t'ai, only in passing and failed to provide it with a reasonable position. Compared with this treatment, the T'ien-t'ai system of the Four Teachings assigns a clear role to the Hua-yen Sutra, to wit the Special Teaching. Thus it can be said that Chih-yi's doxology is stricter and more complete. Though Fa-tsang lived later, he did not incorporate T'ien-t'ai in a reasonable manner into his doxology. It is a deficiency of Fa-tsang's system that the Lotus Sutra could not find a proper place therein. The present paper discusses Fa-tsang's attitude mainly by studying all the sections in the Treatise on the Five Teachings in which the Lotus Sutra and T'ien-t'ai are mentioned. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。