查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 芍藥藥材加工方法與基準方劑中芍藥苷含量變化之探討
- 甘草酸對芍藥苷藥物動力學之影響
- Effects of Veratrine and Paeoniflorin in Mice by Writhing Response Test
- 芍藥苷防治大鼠肝細胞體外損傷形態學及生物化學研究
- 白芍鎮痛作用機轉之研究--其主要成分Paeoniflorin與NMDA接受體間關係之研究
- 杞菊地黃丸濃縮散中芍藥苷之定量
- 中草藥標準品Paeoniflorin與Paeonol之開發及檢驗技術之研究
- Simultaneous Analysis of Nine Components in "Byi-Liang-Tang" Preparation by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- 中草藥複方四物之高效率萃取製程之研發
- Simultaneous Analysis of Seven Components in Hsiao-Ching-Lung-Tang Preparation by High Performance Liquid Chromatography
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 芍藥藥材加工方法與基準方劑中芍藥苷含量變化之探討=Studies of Paeoniflorin Contents in Paeonia Lactifloria from Different Preparations and Prescriptions in Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 李威著; 張永勳; 劉晉魁; 何禮剛; 謝明村; | 書刊名 | 中醫藥雜誌 |
卷期 | 9:3 1998.09[民87.09] |
頁次 | 頁145-155 |
分類號 | 414.5 |
關鍵詞 | 芍藥; 芍藥苷; 移行率; Paeonia lactifloria; Paeoniflorin; Turnover rate; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究以高效液相層析(HPLC)對不同來源芍藥藥材中paeoniflorin與以定量分析, 比較其不同加工方式對成分的影響,以及探討中藥基準方中含芍藥基準方劑中paeoniflorin 的移行率,以作為藥材良窳選擇與實施中藥基準方後中藥製劑的參考,以助中藥的現代化與 科學化。結果發現,蠲痹湯之標準湯劑及浸膏劑之移行率為單味藥材之83.86%及73.69%; 血府逐瘀湯為67.69%及66.36%;小青龍湯為91.56%及88.39%;四物湯為91.17%及91.49%; 百合固金湯為95.40%及90.72%;桂枝湯為80.22%及83.60%;八珍湯為90.84%及82.50%; 獨活寄生湯為81.56%及82.44%;完帶湯為86.42%及77.56%。至於不同加工方式之芍藥藥 材所含paeoniflorin之含量實驗部分,確定了杭芍與亳芍於原產地之加工方式不同,杭芍為 先削皮後煎煮,亳芍為先煎煮後削皮。 |
英文摘要 | In order to proceed a stable quality for Chinese preparations, the government promulgated GMP projects in conduction of the manufactory of Concentrated Extract Chinese Herbal Medicine. The Department of Health also standardized the Chinese Herbal Preparations for the control of quality. It is important to preserve the bioactive constituents while processing concentration of Chinese Herbal Medicine. In the present study, the turnover rates of paeoniflorin from different preparations and prescriptions were evaluated by HPLC quantities. The turnover rates of paeoniflorin were defined as the percentage yields of this component in different Chinese Medical Prescriptions. The results indicated that the turnover rates of Combination and Extracts in Juan-Bi Tang were 83.86% ad 73.69%, respectively. The rates was 67.69% and 66.36% in Xue-Fu-Zu-Yu Tang; 91.56% and 88.39% in Xiao-Qing-Long Tang; 91.17% and 91.49% in Shy-Wuh Tang; 95.40% and 90.72% in Bai-He-Gu-Jin Tang; 80.22% and 83.60% in Gui-Zhi Tang; 90.84% and 82.50% in Ba-Zhen Tang; 81.56% and 82.44% in Du-Huo-Ji-Sheng Tang; 86.42% and 77.56% in Wan-Dai Tang. Besides, Hanh-Shao and Buo-Shao were prepared differently in the origin sites. Hanh-Shao was pealed before further agitating. Buo-Shao was agitated before peeling. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。