查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 三種不同體育教學設計對大專女生健康體能之影響=The Effect of Three Types of Physical Education Design on Health-Related Physical Fitness of the Female Students of College |
---|---|
作 者 | 李致美; 王世椿; | 書刊名 | 體育學報 |
卷 期 | 25 1998.07[民87.07] |
頁 次 | 頁189-198 |
分類號 | 523.37 |
關鍵詞 | 健康體能; 大專女生; 體育教學; Health-related physical fitness; Female student of college; Teaching of physical education; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究探討三種不同體育教學在10週實驗後對大專女生健康體能之影 響。受試者為醒吾商專五專二年級女生148人(平均年齡16.6∼16.7歲), 依健康體能活動介入一般體育課程時間之不同,隨機區分為高介入組(46 人),低介入組(52人)和仍以一般體育課程進行教學(沒有健康體能介入 活動)之一般組(50人)。並以國立臺灣師大學校體育研究發展中心製訂的 健康體能測驗項目:(一)身體質量指數;(二)坐姿體前彎;(三)一分鐘屈膝仰臥起 坐;(四)立定跳遠;(五)800公尺跑走等五項,另增加肱三頭肌皮脂厚測量,總共 六項為本研究評量項目。結果發現高介入組實驗後坐姿體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐 以及800公尺跑走成績顯著(p<0.05)優於實驗前水準,進步幅度分別為 (21.7%、21.6%和7.4%),低介入組僅屈膝仰臥起坐和800公尺跑走達 顯著進步水準(p<0.05),但兩項進步幅度(14.2%和5.9%)都低於高介入 組,而一般組沒有任何項目顯著改變。結論:10週一般體育教學中,增加健 康體能活動高介入組方式,對改善健康體能效果較大,低介入組效果有限,一 般組沒有任何顯著效果。 |
英文摘要 | This study investigated the effects of three types of physical education design for the health-related physical fitness (HRPF) after ten weeks training to the female student of college. The 148 second grade students of Hsing Wu College of Commerce, mean age 16.6-16.7 yrs., were studied. According to interfere time of difference with HRPF were separated of random the high interfere (HI) group (no 46); low interfere (LI) group (no. 52) and general physical education teaching as a general (GE) group (no. 50). The examination were assessed using a nationally known (established by Physical Education Research and Development Center National Taiwan Normal University) HRPF test, including 1) body mass index 2)sit and reach 3) one-minute timed sit-ups 4) standing long jump 5)800 meter run-walk, and extra added body fat survey, which total had six items for this research. Results indicated that the HI group had significant (p<0.05) progress in sit and reach (21.7 %)、one-minute timed sit-ups (21.6%) and 800 mater run-walk (7.4%). The LI group had significant (p<0.05) improvement in onr-minute timed sit-ups (14.2%) and 800 meter run-walk (5.9%) only, but all the progressive rates lower than the HI group. The GE group hadn't any significant (p>0.05) improvement in HRPF. Conclusions: The HI group who has large effects that better than the LI group and GE group when the fematle students of college went to improve the HRPF for ten weeks. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。