查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國家與資本:論中山先生節制資本的時代意義=State and Capital: The Zeitgeist of Capital-Regulation in Dr. Sun Yat-Sens Thought |
---|---|
作 者 | 高永光; 劉佩怡; | 書刊名 | 人文學報 |
卷 期 | 22 1998.07[民87.07] |
頁 次 | 頁1-15 |
分類號 | 551.5 |
關鍵詞 | 國家; 資本; 市場; 國家自主性; 國家能力; Stuate; Capital; Marhit state autonomy; State capacity; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文的主旨在比較各學說強調「國家」與「資本」之間應有的對應關係,並從此一途徑分析中山先生「節制資本」的觀念。其中,代表西方經濟學主流價值的古典與新古典主義認為,國家的存在應以確保私有資本制度的安全為目的;但馬克思卻因而指出,國家因此成為一個「資產階級的管理委員會」而已。雖然其後的馬克思主義者認為,國家其實存在著相對於階級的自主性,但基本上,這些學說都是以社會為中心的思考系絡。「新國家主義」研究途徑則是對立於「社會中心論」而出現,強調應把國家視為一個獨立變數來看待。而中山先生「節制資本」的觀念是主張將資本歸結到國家,突顯由國家主導市場的必須性。就此而言,正是「新國家主義」所要強調的對象。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between state and capital in Dr. Sun's Capital-Regulation idea. We also try to compare current doctrines on this issue. There in, Neo-State assumes the state as an independent variable to discuss the relationship between state and capital. It is opposite to Society- Centered Theories. However, Society-Centered Theories in this paper includes of Classical Economics, Neoclassical Economics, Marxism, and Neo-Marxism, Classical Economics and Neoclassical Economics refer that the purpose of state is to protect the private capital system. Some Neo-Marxists argue this point. They think that the state is not an instrument of ruling class, which owns its autonomy. Thus, Dr Sun insists that the state should dominate capital and lead market. On the other have, should set the state as an independent variable. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。