查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Aboriginal Children's Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification
- 學生動物分類及脊椎動物概念的發展:跨年齡研究
- 蟲豸書﹣﹣中國傳統的動物分類
- 國小學童知覺選擇與動物分類概念之研究
- A Study of the Concept "Living Organism" and Living Organism Classification in Aboriginal Children
- 職前生物教師動物分類另有概念之研究
- 評臺灣動物保護法二○一五年之修正
- 應用數位影音融入POE教學改善國小高年級學童脊椎動物分類另有概念之效益研究
- 山地兒童智力測驗成績的檢討
- 奧地利聯邦動物保護法--兼論其對我國動保法之借鏡
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Aboriginal Children's Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification=山地兒童動物概念及動物分類之研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳世輝; 古智雄; | 書刊名 | Proceedings of the National Science Council : Part D, Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education |
卷 期 | 8:2 1998.05[民87.05] |
頁 次 | 頁55-67 |
分類號 | 380.3 |
關鍵詞 | 山地兒童; 動物概念; 動物分類; Aborigines; Animal; Conceptions of animals; Classification; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | This study examined aboriginal children's conceptions of animals and animal classification. Thirty-six students were selected from the 2nd, 4th, and 6th grades of two elementary schools in Hualien. A clinical interview and a classification task, involving the sorting of pictures of animals into major classes, were administered. The results indicated four forms of classification thinking: (a)living; (b)non-living; (c)animal, with scientifically acceptable attributes; and (d)animal, with scientifically unacceptable attributes. Children in all grades usually used a combination of the last two forms. Movement and eating were the most commonly used attributes for identifying animals. The label "animal" was usually applied to large, terrestrial mammals found in zoos or in the jungle. Humans were not categorized as animals by a substantial number of children, particularly in the lower grades. Although some of those in the higher grades were aware that humans were animals, the reasons given were irrelevant to animal attributes and improperly derived from the biological concept of "evolution" It was also found that the children's understanding of biological classification was generally poor. Even when the children could classify an animal instance as a subset of "animal" correctly, they still tended to consider it as a "non-animal" set. It seems that the children considered the subsets of animals as comparable sets to the set of animals. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。