查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Comparison of Efficacy of Five Anesthetics in Goldlined Sea Bream, Sparus Sarba
- 2-phenoxyethanol對黃錫鯛的麻醉作用
- Benzocaine、Lidocaine和Ethyl ether對吳郭魚的麻醉效果及使用方便性之比較
- Comparison of Anesthetical Efficiency of Benzocaine and Ethyl Ether in Tilapia, Oreochromis Mossambicus
- Benzocaine與Ethyl ether對鯽魚的麻醉效果比較
- 兩種非揮發性麻醉劑對鯽魚之麻醉效果與受愛用程度之比較
- Lidocaine與Ethyl ether對鯽魚的麻醉效果與受愛用程度之比較
- 三種常用麻醉劑對吳郭魚的麻醉效果及受愛用程度之比較
- Nitro変-L-Arginine Methyl Ester Decreases Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Isoflurane and Reduces Brain Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity in Rats
- 以2-phenoxyethanol麻醉草蝦可能性之探討
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Comparison of Efficacy of Five Anesthetics in Goldlined Sea Bream, Sparus Sarba=五種麻醉劑對黃錫鯛的麻醉效果之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 許晉榮; 葉信利; 朱永桐; 丁雲源; | 書刊名 | Acta Zoologica Taiwanica |
卷 期 | 9:1 1998.01[民87.01] |
頁 次 | 頁11-18 |
分類號 | 438.661 |
關鍵詞 | 麻醉劑; 有效濃度; 黃錫鯛; Anesthetic; Effective concentration; Sparus sarba; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 在很多以魚類為材的實驗過程中,將實驗魚麻醉,往往是必需的步驟。目前,已有很多的化學物質被發現具有魚類麻醉劑的功能,它們在實用上,各有其優缺點。在本研究中,我們比較五種常用的魚類麻醉劑(quinaldine, quinate, MS-222, benzocaine及2-phenoxyethanol)對黃錫鯛的麻醉效果。結果顯示,浸潤於五種麻醉劑溶液中之黃錫鯛,其麻醉誘導時間會隨麻醉劑濃度升高而減少,但恢復時間卻不因麻醉劑濃度不同而有顯著變化。各麻醉劑的有效濃度(可使魚類在3分內被麻醉,改置清水後5分內恢復的濃度)分別為quinaldine (9μl/l), quinate (20 mg/l), MS-222 (100 mg/l), benzocaine (50 mg/l)及2-phenoxyethanol ((400μl/l)。最後,我們亦對此五種麻醉劑實際運用在海水魚上的優劣,作一簡單的比較。 |
英文摘要 | Anesthetics are often used to immobilize fish in experimental research. Many chemicals have proved effective in anesthetization of fish. Each chemical has its own advantages and drawbacks. In this study, we selected five anesthetics, quinaldine, quinate, MS-222, benzo-caine, and 2-phenoxyethanol, to test the efficacy in anesthetization of goldlined sea bream, Sparus sarba. Our results indicate that the induction time of the fish exposed to the five anesthetic solutions generally decreased with increasing concentrations, but the recovery time was concentration independent. The effective concentrations which produced anes-thesia within 3 min and allowed recovery within 5 min for the respective anesthetics in goldlined sea bream were: quinaldine, 9 μl/l; quinate, 20 mg/l; MS-222, 100 mg/l; benzo-caine, 50 mg/l; and 2-phenoxyethanol, 400 μl/l. We also present a table which briefly com-pares advantages and drawbacks of the five anesthetics. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。