查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論電信普及服務制度之設立=The Implementation of Telecom Universal Service Mechanism |
---|---|
作 者 | 高凱聲; | 書刊名 | 經社法制論叢 |
卷 期 | 21 1998.01[民87.01] |
頁 次 | 頁105-131 |
分類號 | 557.7 |
關鍵詞 | 電信普及服務制度; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對於我國信普及服務制度之設置,目前仍在依法研議中預計民國九十年才 開始實施。本文主要目的,想就電信普及服務制度設計之概念、服務範圍、普及 成本推估、基金設立型態等做一系列的探討,期能拋磚引玉,使我國電信普及服 務機制能早日設立,並進而促使電信事業蓬勃健全發展。本文經過一連串分析與 探討,並衡酌本國國情,特歸納出幾個重點表列如下: 1.普及服務及普及服務基全之設立,在我國有法律文規定,我國目前已進 行規劃預計民國90年7月開始實施。 2.普及服務成本是一種淨成本,其為可避免成本扣除棄置營收後之成本。如 為取信於各個USF分攤業者,可將淨成本再加以效率化調整,以成為效 率化淨成本。 3.不經濟區和不經濟用戶之篩選,主要應以話務量做為衡量基礎。人口密 度,偏遠地區等行政因素慬能做為補充因素非主要基礎。而話務量和行政 區往往不互相吻合,我國宜採用交換局為衡量基礎,行政區域為申請單 位。另外,對於缺乏實際資料的地區可以採用全國平均值加以估算。 4.普及服務基金,依據電信法宜成立實體基金,由電信總局加以管理。 5.普及服務成本分攤,可依據各業者營收大小進行比例分攤,除容易取得資 料外也比較合乎公平原則。 6.普及服務本身雖有淨成本發生,但只要提供服務其本身也存有許多無形利 益;營運循環效果、遍佈效果、強化品牌形象及公司聲譽效果以及求續穩 健經營等效果。 7.對於USO範圍和可避免成本之計算,不可能一蹴可及做到盡善盡美,但 可以採分期方式逐步擴大適用範圍。此外,USO成本不是一次攤提完 畢,而是配合營收分年逐次繳交。 |
英文摘要 | Telecom universal service (US) mechanism in Taiwan being under study at the present stage is scheduled to be implemented in 2001. This article addresses to concept, service scope, and cost calculation of US as well as the formation of universal service fund (USF). It is hoped that the article may serve as a brick being thrown to get a piece of jade in return. It is also anticipated that the article may further contribute to the early implementation of US mechanism for sound and prosperous development in our telecom sector. In the context, a series of analysis and study have been made, and our present conditions have been taken into chsideration. Some key points of this article are itemized as follows: 1.The formation of US mechanism and USF are stipulated in the Telecommunications Act. We schedule to implement US mechanism in July 2001. 2.Being a net cost in nature, US cost equals the avoidable cost minus foregone revenue. In order to convince USF contributors, net cost may be weighted by efficiency to become an efficiency related net cost. 3.The screening of uneconomic areas and uneconomic subscribers should mainly be based on traffic volume. The administrative factors such as population density and remote rural areas can only be deemed as supplemental factors instead of principal basis. As traffic volume is not always consistent with administrative districts, it is more proper for us to adopt local exchange coverage as the measure unit. Besides, national average value can be adopted for estimation of US cost in areas lacking of actual data. 4.According to the Telecommunications Act, a tangible USF should be established to be administered by DGT. 5.US cost can be shared by telecom operators respectively according to their revenue ratio. Such method is more fair and advantageous to acquire data. 6.As universal service results in net cost, it also brigns various intangible benefits to the US providers such as operational circulation effect, ubiquity effect, brand image and croporate reputation enhancement, and persistent solid operation, etc. 7.The definition of the scope of universal service obligation (USO) and the calculation of avoidable cost can not be perfectly done over night. However, phase-by-phase method can be applied for gradual enlargement in the scope. Besides, contribution to the USO eost can not be completed once for all. On the contrary, it should be made annually according to the operators revenue. The implementation of US mechanism involves the interests of the majority and telecom operators. Therefor, the authority concerned should widely solicit comments from the pubic and made thorough consideration prior to any decision. Most importantly, periodical review should be conducted after the establishment of US mechanism for any possible improvement. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。