查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國小語文學習障礙兒童在「修訂考夫曼兒童智力測驗」與「魏氏兒童智力量表」表現之分析=The Performance of K-ABC and WISC-R for Children with Learning Disabilities |
---|---|
作者 | 黃桂君; Huang, Kuei-chung; |
期刊 | 新竹師院學報 |
出版日期 | 19980200 |
卷期 | 11 1998.02[民87.02] |
頁次 | 頁301-325 |
分類號 | 529.69 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 學習障礙; Learning disability; K-ABC; WISC-R; |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討「修訂考夫曼兒童智力測驗」(K-ABC)與「修訂魏氏兒童智力量表」(WISC-R)在學習障礙組和普通組兒K-ABC與WISC-R的表現。研究樣本各包括四十 名國小普通兒童與語文學習障礙兒童。其主要研究結果如下: 一、兩組兒童在K-ABC智力量表與WISC-R作業智商間均具有中度的相關,其變異重疊程度足以支持K-ABC對兒童智力測量的獨特貢獻。 二、學障組與普通組兒童在K-ABC智力量表與WISC-R全量表變項個體內能力差異形態,僅平行思考量表中之「圓形類推」,WISC-R語文量表中之「類同測驗」、「詞彙測驗」具有顯著差異。 三、K-ABC智力量表各分測驗區別命中率達62.50%;K-ABC智力量表與成就量表各分測驗之區別命中率達92.50%;WISC-R全量表各分測驗之區別命中率達86.25%,均能有效區別學障組與普通組兒童。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to compare on the perforamces of Kaufmam Assessment Battery for Childern (K-ABC) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) for children with learning disabilities (LD) and normal children. The subjects of this study included forty normal students and forty students who had been identified as learning disability with "deviation from grade level" method and placed in the resource rooms for Chinese Language remedial instructions. The major findings of this study were as follows: (1) Moderate correlations between K-ABC and WISC-R in two groups indicated that the same general construct is being measured on both two instruments. This also shows that the K-ABC has enough unique gualities to constribute new information to the assessment of ability. (2) LD students performed significantly different from normal students on the Martix Analogies in the K-ABC Simultaneous Processing Scales, and on the Similarities, Vocabulary of the WISC-R. (3) The subtests of K-ABC Mental Processing Scales had strong power in discriminating between groups with 62.50 accuracy. The subtests of K-ABC Mental Processing Scales and Achievement Scales had strong power in discriminating between groups with 92.5% accuracy. The subtests of WISC-R Full Scald had strong power in discriminating between groups with 62.50 accuracy. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。