頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 有關多神論的哲學思想=On Polytheism |
---|---|
作 者 | 張雪珠; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 25:2=285 1998.02[民87.02] |
頁 次 | 頁122-127+196-197 |
分類號 | 216.3 |
關鍵詞 | 多神論; 神話; 擬人化; 自然哲學; 休謨; 宗教起源論; 一神論; 民間信仰; Polytheism; Myth; Anthropomorphism; Philosophy of nature; David Human; Origin of religions; Monotheism; Civil beliefs; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 對於擬人化的神話多神信仰,希臘哲學家們大致採取辯證的批判態度。至於將宗教當做人類社會的一件普遍事實,從宗教起源的角度,對多神信仰提出理論說明的,則直待到啓蒙運動時代的經驗主義者休謨。在多神論的宗教裡,諸神或是自然現象或是歷史偉人的神化,在自然界和人間各有專司。從此觀點來看,多神論一方面表達了人類古老的一個信念:凡俗中有神聖的因素,另一方面反映了人類在超越界尋求人生諸問題之圓滿解答的自然傾向,只不過它所採用的方式是未經理性嚴密審核所開的方便之門。 |
英文摘要 | Greek philosophers, in general, dialectically criticize anthropomorphic myth or polytheism. The first philosopher treating religion as a common phenomenon in human societies and explaining theoretically polytheism from the angle of religious origin is D. Hume, and empiricist in the Enlightenment. According to polytheistic religions, deities, deified natural phenomena and great figures in history play their own specialized roles in nature or on earth. Seeing from this point, we can say polytheism, on the one hand, signifies and old human belief: heavenliness interfuses earthliness; on the other hand, it reflects human natural inclination to ask the transcendent for satisfactory replies to existential questions, only that this convenient approach is not yet strictly examined by reason. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。