查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | AHP與修正後AHP以方案排序為基礎的比較=A Comparison between AHP and Modified AHP Based on Rankings Among Alternatives |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 賴世剛; 方溪泉; | 書刊名 | 都市與計劃 |
卷期 | 24:2 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁次 | 頁211-224 |
分類號 | 557.82 |
關鍵詞 | 分析階層程式法; 多屬性效用理論; 偏好; 尺度化方法; Analytic hierarchy process; Multiattribute utility theory; Preferences; Scaling methods; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文介紹一結合分析階層程序法國家(AHP)及多屬性效用理論(MAUT)之修正後的分 析階層程序法 (AHP')。本文並說明 AHP 與 MAUT 之間尺度化的轉換。藉由專家學者問卷使 用三種評估方式:直覺判斷、AHP、及 AHP', 本文比較 AHP 與 AHP' 表現決策者偏好的效 果。 在問卷中控制使用 AHP 及 AHP' 的順序且使用該二法前後均採用直覺判斷的設計。該 問卷比較係以第二高速公路沿線高架橋下土地使用方案評估一逼真案例。即使大多數受訪者 認為 AHP 較 AHP' 為佳,但分析結果發現在表現決策者偏好能力方面, AHP' 較 AHP 為佳 。此比較係以方案優劣排序依據,而非以偏好結構比較標準。 |
英文摘要 | The paper introduces a modified version of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), or AHP', as combination of AHP and multiattribute utility theory (MAUT). The transformation of scaling between AHP and MAUT is demonstrated in terms of matrix algebra. A comparison between the effectiveness of AHP and AHP' in expressing decision makers' preferences was made by sampling among planning practitioners applying AHP and AHP'. The order of applying AHP and AHP' was controlled and the holistic judgments were made in the beginning and the end of the questionnaire. A realistic planning problem of evaluating alternative land uses under an overpass of the Second Highway was designed for conducting the survey. AHP' performed better than AHP in terms of expressing decision makers' preferences though most respondents preferred AHP to AHP'. The comparison was based on decision makers' rankings among alternatives, rather than on preference structures. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。