頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臺灣三個衛生計畫的技術面主觀評估=A Technical Evaluation on Three Health Plans in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 李卓倫; | 書刊名 | 公共衛生 |
卷 期 | 24:3 1997.10[民86.10] |
頁 次 | 頁137-149 |
分類號 | 412.1、412.1 |
關鍵詞 | 衛生計畫; 理性; 全民健康保險; 醫療網; 國民保健; Health planning; Rationality; National health insurance; Medical framework; National health promotion; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以理性計畫中的十個標準來評估醫療網、全民健康保險和國民保健三個臺灣 近十年來的重要衛生計畫,也藉此呈現理性計畫應有的一些特徵。比較結果顯示,三個計畫 都未能符合所有的標準,但屬於獨立計畫組織型態的全民健康保險計畫,比較容易傾向由所 欲達成的價值出發來推導量化目標,並藉分析現況以尋求有效的替選策略,再經替選策略的 比較提高方案與目標間的聯繫。醫療網與全民健康保險計畫的目標由的於牽涉到社會公平的 考量,符合公共利益的程度高於國民保健計畫,政府欲介入以健康為主要目標之計畫的基本 困難在本文也略有討論。 |
英文摘要 | This paper compares the three most important health plans of the last decade in Taiwan, the national medical network, national health insurance and national health promotion, with ten criteria of the rational planning model. It might also be seen as the presentation of the core concepts of rational planning by these three typical examples for local public health workers. The result indicates that, being organizationally independent in its planning process, the national health insurance plan has more intentions to derive its objectives from its values of the goals, to analyse empirical findings for the alternative strategies, to forecast possible consequences of alternatives, and to make the strategies significantly correlated to the objectives. Because of the societal equity issues, the goals of national medical network and national health insurance plans involve more public interests than national health promotion project. The inherent obstacles of the government's intervention in those projects with health as its basic goal are also discussed in this paper. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。