查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 大學生在被諷刺弱點事件中氣憤因應行為相關因素之研究=A Study on Undergraduate Student's Reacting Behavior of Receiving the Ironic Remarks and Its Related Variables |
---|---|
作者 | 方紫薇; Fang, Tzu-wei; |
期刊 | 中華輔導學報 |
出版日期 | 19971200 |
卷期 | 5 1997.12[民86.12] |
頁次 | 頁42-82 |
分類號 | 171.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 氣憤因應行為; 認知; 氣憤程度; 情境; 氣憤特質; 性別; 自尊; 長短期效果; Anger trait; Anger intensity; Sex; Reacting behavior; Self-esteem; Cognition; Situation; Long; Short-terms; |
中文摘要 | 本研究之目的在探討大學生在談話時被諷刺弱點,而被激怒時,當時的想法、情 境公開性、氣憤特質、氣憤程度、自尊、性別、對方性別對其因應行為之影響,及不同因應 行為所產生長短期之正負向效果。研究對象為1364位大學生,分別施測氣憤情境、氣憤特質、 自尊三個量表,其結果分述如下: 1.各變項可以有效預測三種因應行為,其中溝通想法最能有效預測掌控生氣,責備想法最 能有效預測表達生氣,責備想法及避免衝突想法最能有效預測氣在心裡的分數。 2.男性在表達生氣的分數上顯著高於女性,女性在氣在心裡的分數顯著高於男性。 3.性別和對方性別有交互作用,男女對異性皆較會採掌控生氣之方式,女生對女性易用氣 在心裡之方式,而男性對男性易用表達生氣之方式。 4.在情境公開性上,兩人獨處時掌控生氣之分數顯著高於有其他人在場之分數,而在有其 他人在場時,則是氣在心裡的分數顯著高於兩人獨處時之分數。 5.氣憤特質高者,易採表達生氣及氣在心裡之方式,而低氣憤特質者較易採掌控生氣之因 應行為。 6.氣憤程度高者,易採表達生氣及氣在心裡之方式,而低氣憤特質者較易採掌控生氣之因 應行為。 7.自尊方面,只有在氣在心裡的分數有顯著差異,低自尊者較高自尊者易採氣在心裡的因 應行為。 8.掌控生氣之長短期效果皆優於表達生氣及氣在心�堥漜捸C 兩組。 陛C 28. 掌控生氣之長短期效果皆優於表達生氣及氣在心�堥漜捸C |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the way of thinking at the moment, situation publicity, anger trait, anger intensity, self-esteem and sex on the reacting behavoior when the undergraduate student's anger is extremely triggered after he or she receiving the ironic remarks owing to his or her awkward events from the conversation with others. The short-term and long-term positive or negative effects from the different reacting behaviors are also studies. The investigation was performed on 1364 undergraduate students and focused on the three evaluatons: anger situational scale, anger trait, and self-esteem scales. The outcomes are briefly described as follows: 1.Each variable can effectively predict three reacting behaviors, in which the communicative intention is the most efficient way to predict the anger-control reacting behavior; reproaching intention is the most efficient way to predict the anger-out reacting behavior; while the reproaching intention and the avoiding-conflict intension are the most efficient ways to predict the score of anger-in reacting behavior. 2.The male student has higher score in anger-out and lower score in anger-in than the female one. 3.Findngs indicated a significant interaction between subject gender and target person gender in expressing anger, both male and female are easier to follow anger-control reacting behavior when his or her anger is triggered by different sex. Nevertheless, female student has a tendency to be anger-in when her anger is triggered by the same sex, while male student is easier to be anger-out when triggered by the other males. 4.In the aspect of situation publicity, the situation with only two persons alone has higher score in the anger control reacting behavior than the situatin with other persons present. However, the latter has higher score in the anger-in reacting behavior. 5.The student with high anger trait is easier to exhibit the anger-out and anger-in reacting behavior, while the low anger trait student like to exhibit the anger-control reacting behavior. 6.The student with high anger intensity is easier to follow the anger-out and anger-in reacting behavior, while the low anger intensity student like to follow the anger control reacting behavior. 7.In the aspect of self-esteem, the one with low self-esteem is more likely to react anger-in behavior than the one with high self-esteem. 8.The effect of short term and long term of anger-control group is better than the group with anger-out or anger-in reacting behavior. avior. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。