查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 校園暴力行為之診斷與處理策略研究=Aggression Prevention and Control in Junior High School |
---|---|
作 者 | 鄔佩麗; 洪儷瑜; | 書刊名 | 教育心理學報 |
卷 期 | 29 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁 次 | 頁177-214 |
分類號 | 527.59 |
關鍵詞 | 校園暴力; 偏差行為; 校園安全; 實地研究; 校園生活經驗問卷; 校園衝突事件回溯記錄表; School violence; Conduct discorder; School safety; Field study; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究之主要目的,企圖從臺北市兩所國民中學的校園診斷結果,來詮釋我國現 階段中等學校教育環境的校園暴行的現象,進而對我國的中等教育的輔導措施提出一些具體 建議。本研究採用行動取向的實地研究法。蒐集資料的步驟,除了用問卷與訪談的技術外, 同時和學校行政單位與學校教師做團體或個別式的交談,以確認或補足問卷與訪談過程中所 得到的資料。本研究的研究對象為分別分佈於傳統老舊社區及商業社區的兩所學校,除了以 學生為調查對象之外,也對該兩所學校的物理環境與師生互動現象進行評估。因此本所究的 資料蒐集分為三大部分,第一部份為以「校園生活經驗問卷」調查學生是否看過、遭受、做 過校園暴力行為;並以「校園衝突事件回溯記錄表」對教師進行調查。對象為一、二、三年 級的學生與各班導師,以及學校行政人員。甲校學生 320 人,乙校學生 176 人,男女各半 ,採隨機取樣;甲校導師 80 位,乙校導師 44,位,包括行政人員發出 143 份調查問卷, 共收回 136 份 (甲校 85 份,乙校 51 份。 ) 第二部份為座談與深入訪談資料,座談對象 為兩校教師與行政人員,甲校人數計 21 位 (教師 9 位, 行政人員 12 位 ),乙校人數計 16 位 (教師 8 位,行政人員 8 位 ),共計 37 位。另以「校園暴行訪談記錄表」訪談 12 位學生,甲校六名,乙校六名,男女各半,均為自願接受訪談者。甲校因訪談時間安排有誤 ,有一名女學生的資料未列入分析。第三部份為自然觀察法,由曾有觀察校園經驗的臺灣師 大心輔系大學部三年級學生數名,以「校園生態觀察記錄表」,在一星期內一天五個時段 ( 早自習、上課、下課、午休、放學時間 ),校園的物理環境 (分教學區、行政區、休閒區、 校門口、校園角落 ),與師生互動現象做描述性記錄。茲將本研究在甲乙兩校所進行的調查 、座談、訪談與觀察結果彙整為以下六點結論:(1) 校際間的問題類型差異不大,均以輕度 攻擊性行為佔大多數,重度攻擊性行為佔小部份;(2) 師生之間對事件的詮釋有明顯的認知 差距;(3) 教師對自己處理問題的能力普遍缺乏信心;(4) 學生對學習的環境有焦慮的比率 相當高;(5) 學生對自己的行為缺乏自我控制力,也缺乏保護自己的能力;(6) 無論學校行 政單位、教師學生對現有的環境均感到強烈的無力感。因此研究小組建議能加強學校行政的 協調與執行能力,提昇教師對學生的表達能力與處理問題的能力,並強調幫助學生從發洩情 緒、培養學生做理性思考,到學習處理問題的技巧。 |
英文摘要 | Adolescent violence is a growing problem in schools across the coun-try. According to the author's observation, school personnel generally lack of the knowledge of the origin and the appropriate course plan, The purpose of this study is to understand junior high students' antisocial behav-ior patterns. The data were collected through the questionnaire rated by students, staffs, and six observers, and analyzed by SPSS. The impact of violence in the junior high school was examined. It idhypothesized that the school environment and community services in general affect both the students' academic performance and the delinquent behavior. Four hundred and ninety-six students drawn from two junior high schools in Taipei(160 male and 160 female from school I, 88 male and 88 female from school II) participated in this research, The sample of staff subjects (n=136) consists of homeroom teachers and administers in both schools. Thirty-seven staffs are invited to the meeting to share their opinion on aggression prevention in the school. Twelve volunteered students from obth schools are interviewed regarding school violence, Data about school environment (school schedule and campus building) were collected through natural observation by six college students from National Taiwan Normal University. Data collected from students and staffs analyzed, It is found that (1)mild and moderate aggressive behavior are more prominent than severe aggressive behaviors;(2) students tend not to trust school's ablity to protect them;(3) teachers generally lack of self confidence in dealing with the students' conflicts;(4) both students and staffs felt helpless and anxious about the situation; and (5) there are cognitive discrepancies between students and teachers in valuing the quality and the quantity of school violence. This study suggests that it is more effective if interventions take place at the ecological level. Future research on prevention and interven-tion are recommended. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。