查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 健康維護或降低財務風險﹖由兩種觀點來比較公營與自由市場的健康保險制度=Promoting Health or Reducing Financial Risks﹖--Two Normative Views on Pulbic Versus Free Market Health Insurance Systems |
---|---|
作 者 | 紀駿輝; | 書刊名 | 公共衛生 |
卷 期 | 24:2 1997.07[民86.07] |
頁 次 | 頁77-96 |
分類號 | 412.56 |
關鍵詞 | 健康保險; 全民健保; 衛生經濟學; 醫療民營化; Health insurance; National health insurance; Health economics; Privatization of health care; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 健康保險是否與其他的財貨相同而適用於市場競爭原則,為全民健保是否應民營 化的關鍵。本文的目的在由健康保險的理論與本質,來探討全民健保公民營的優缺點。文中 首先討論健康保險的理論及實行,並以美國為例,介紹健康保險民營化所產生之弊病。由這 些理論及實例,再來探討全民健保公營與民營的優缺點。在討論公民營的優缺點時,本文由 不同的觀點來看全民健保之精神及目的。依不同的觀點,其所持全民健保之目的不同;因而 對健保公民營其優缺點之評估標準亦不同。本文分別由兩種典型的觀點一視健保為私財,及 視健保為公財之觀點與標,來檢驗健保公民營之優缺點。最後,本文嘗試介紹大多數實施全 民健保的國家其全民健保之精神,並以此精神論及健康保險乃異於其他財貨的理論,來提出 健保為什麼應該公營。 |
英文摘要 | The nature of health insurance, and whether the existing market system is the appropriate mechansim for distributing such service, has been at the center of debate in many countries. This paper examines the arguments for public administered versus privatized health insurance system from the two diverse perspectives: treating health insurance as private good versus merit good. The author begins with discussing the theories, nature, and practice of health insurance. This is followed by presenting two diverse typical views on health insurance. These two perspectives have different views on the nature and purpose of health insurance, and therefore, have different criteria for evaluating health insurance systems. These two perspectives and criteria were used to critically examine the comparative advantages and disadvantages of public versus market-oriented health insurance systems. Finally, this paper presents a rationale and objective of health insurance that is commonly accepted among most industrialized nations. Using such rationale and objective, and the expericence of the United States as an example, the author argues the inappropriateness of relying on market to distribute health insurance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。