查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 不定練習與目標空間限制對技能絕佳預期時宜的影響=The Effect of Variable Practice and Target Spatial Constraint on Coincidece Anticipation Timing |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳秀惠; 林清和; | 書刊名 | 體育學報 |
卷 期 | 23 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁 次 | 頁287-298 |
分類號 | 528.915 |
關鍵詞 | 絕佳預期時宜; 不定練習; Coincidence anticipation timing; Variable practice; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在利用甩盤擲準的技能絕佳預期時宜(coincidence anticipation timing, 以下簡稱CAT)操作來檢驗不定練習假說,同時探討有無目標空間的限制對CAT的影響。以104 名小學四年級女童,分組練習每天30次共五天的實驗操作後,於第五天進行3和6mph兩種刺 激速度下的立即遷移測驗。二因子變異數分析結果顯示,在6mph的遷移速度中,絕對時宜誤出 現交互作用,經過進一步以單純主要效果分析,發現在有空間的情況下,固定組小於不定組;而 在速度不定的情形中,無空間組小於有空間組。同時,在3mph遷移速度中,於相對誤差和起始 動作時間、動作時間等依變項中,皆呈現速度的主要效果;固定組顯著的較不定組提早、且較 快。到了延後遷移,在6mph的遷移中之變異誤差中,有空間組顯著的小於無空間組。在3mph 遷移中的相對誤差依然與先前一樣,存在顯著效果。研究結果部分支持不定練習假說。同時也 指出,目標空間的限制除了影響了CAT的表現和不定練習假說的實證結果。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of the study is to determine the variability of practice hypothesis as well as to investigate the effect of with/without target spatial constraint on coincidence anticipation timing (CAT) by using a throw-interception task 104 fourth grade girls assigned to four training groups received 30 trials on each of five days and then test at the fifth day with speeds of 3 and 6mph stimulus not experienced previously. The two-way ANOVA (SPEED×SPACE) revealed an interaction of absolute temporal error (AE) (F=4.12*) when the stimulus was 6mph. The simple main present that under with spatial constraint circumstances, the AE of constant groups are lower than variable groups; while under variable speed circumstances, the AE of without target spatial constrain groups were lower than that of the counter groups. When the stimulus was 3mph, there were significant effects of Speed, F=17.75*, on constant temporal error (CE); F=5.77*, on initiation time (INT); F=4.86*, on movement duration (MD). The variable groups were significant earlier (CE, INT) and faster than constant groups. The SPACE effect exist during delay transfer test (F=5.51*) on variable temporal error (VET), the with spatial constrain groups were significant lower than the without ones in 6mph. When the stimulus was 3mph, CE showed SPEED effect (F=5.51*) as that in prior test. It was concluded that, firstly, the variability practice hypothesis was rt partially supported. Secondly, target spatial constrain effect the CAT performance as well as the favor of variability prediction. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。