頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 康德的先驗理想論與理性的形上旨趣=Kant's Theory of the Transcendental Ideal and the Metaphysical Interest of the Reason |
---|---|
作 者 | 張雪珠; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 26:9=304 1999.09[民88.09] |
頁 次 | 頁823-857+893 |
分類號 | 147.45 |
關鍵詞 | 康德; 先驗觀念; 先驗理想; 純粹理性批判; 調節原理; 結構原理; Immanuel Kant; Transcendental ideal; Critigue of pure reason; Regulative principle; Constructive principle; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在康德的《純粹理性批判》中所謂的「先驗理想」,具雙重的主觀認知作用。一個是作為物之完全限定的先驗原理,另一個是理性系統統一自然知識的調節原理。事實上,先驗理想的這兩個作用,就內容上完全取自於康德批判前期的兩個論證,即存有神學論證與改良物理神學論證。批判期與批判前期的推論過程,也都同樣透過雙重的統一原理:世界內在的統一原理與世界超越的統一原理。所不同的只是知識論立埸的差別:批判前期的論證從實在論的角度,所處理的是客觀的對象;先驗理想的理論從先驗觀念論的角度,處理的是知識可能的主觀條件。簡言之,先驗理想理論是批判前期兩個論證的先驗觀念論的轉型,也是批判前期兩論證的先驗說明。 |
英文摘要 | The so-called “transcendental ideal” in Kant's Critique of (Pure reason has two subjective cognitive functions. One is the transcendental principle of the complete determination of thing; the other is the regulative principle by virtue of which rational system unifies natural knowledge. In fact, these two functions of the transcendental ideal are derived from two arguments at the early stage of Kant's Critique, i.e. the argument of the ontological proof of the existence of God, and that of the hysicotheological proof of the existence of God. The discursive processes of the period of criticism and the early stage of criticism use the same principle: the principle of the sensed world, and that of the transcendental world. The difference between the two is their epistemological positions: The latter starts from realism, and deals with objects; the former starts from the transcendental idealism, deals with the possible conditions of knowledge. In short, the transcendental idealism is not only a change from the two arguments at the early stage of the Critique, but also the transcendental explication of those two arguments. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。