頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 品質權衡法估價績效之實證=Empirical Comparison of Weighted Quality Rating Method with Hedonic Price Model |
---|---|
作 者 | 李明龍; | 書刊名 | 臺灣土地金融季刊 |
卷 期 | 34:3=133 1997.09[民86.09] |
頁 次 | 頁79-94 |
分類號 | 554.89 |
關鍵詞 | 估價; 品質權衡法; 特徵價格法; Valuation; Weighted quality rating method; Hedonic price model; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 臺灣估價相關學術研究近來已朝向基於特徵價格法之各類相關迴歸分析比較。然 而或許部份是因為所需技巧的複雜,研究採用的方法並未見於實務運用,不動產鑑定業界仍 舊主要依賴為人詬病主觀性太強的傳統市場比較法。有鑑於此,本文介紹一技巧簡單且客觀 程度較高的品質權衡法,並與特徵價格法作估價績效比較。經實證民國八十三年六月至八十 四年五月臺北市大同區住宅交易資料,前法的成交價格預測能力似乎較後法穩定,且兩者預 測能力並沒有顯著差距。可見品質權衡法具有實務使用的潛力,但仍待其他時間或地區的類 似研究加以證明。 |
英文摘要 | The direction of Taiwan academic research in valuation is toward to more sophisticated techniques, perphaps partly because these techniques are too complicated, Taiwan valuation practitioners still heavily rely on traditional sales comparison approaches which have been criticised for their subjectivity, This study introduces a simpler technique, weighted quality rating method, and empirically compares its price predicting capability for post-samples with that of the hedonic price model, using transaction data at Da-Tong District in Taipei Metropolis for the one-year period from June 1994 to May 1995. The comparison shows that predicting capability of the former technique seems more stable than that of the latter, but is not statistically different at 5% significance level. This result may indicate not only parsimony prevails in valuation but also the weighted quality rating method has potential for valuation practice. Nevertheless, the indicate needs to be taken with limits of this study in mind. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。