頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 利益償還請求權之探討--以日本法為中心=A Study of Claim for Enrichment of Bill |
---|---|
作 者 | 賴世琳; | 書刊名 | 國立臺中技術學院通識教育學報 |
卷 期 | 5 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁 次 | 頁115-147 |
分類號 | 587.4 |
關鍵詞 | 利益償還請求權; 特別請求權; 票據權利之變形物; 衡平觀念; 消滅時效期間; 持有票據; 除權判決; Claim for enrichment of bill; Special claim; Variety of bill; Concept of equity; Prescription; Hold the bill; Ausschlussurteil; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 利益償還請求權乃票據上權利因時效或手續之欠缺而消滅,以致其目的無法達成時,票據上債務人免除了付款之結果,得承認執票人向其請求已受有利益限度之償還。此權利之性質,早期由衡平觀念所承認,係由票據法之規定所承認之一種特別請求權。由衡平觀念對於票據法之技術的、形式的解決,嘗試實質的修正。但依此說因無法明確此權利之特別性,故尚須附加票據上權利之變形物或殘存物之見解於其上,始為有力,則具有兩者性質之折衷。研究方法主要以日本之學說、判例為主,配合我國之學說、判例為輔而尋求較合適見解。全篇共分為七節:1.意義;2.當事人;3.發生要件;4.權利之行使、讓與;5.消滅時效期間;6.支票特有問題;7.結論。當中第三節之票據債務人受有利益,係應採非二次性說;即執票人只須對某一票據債務人權利消滅時,若其受有利益,即得向其請求利益償還為是。而於我國之文獻甚少著墨,幾乎全部引用自前田庸教授之著作(情非得已),但又比對林竧、福瀧博之等諸教授之學說,而認定前田教授之見解為妥當。並且對第五節之消滅時效期間及第六節之支票利益償還請求權,作比較詳細分析。此領域為我國票據法領域較少學者踏入者,筆者大膽嘗試,大量引用前田庸、服部榮三、川村正幸、畑肇、田中昭、三枝一雄、田邊光政、後藤紀一等諸教授著書論文,盼予學界注入新的活水。 |
英文摘要 | The claim for enrichment of bill is extinguished by prescription, or lacking for proceeding (of recourse for non-payment), to cause the holder of bill can not attain his purpose. When the bill debtor is exempted from payment, to recognize the holder can ask the claim for enrichment of debtor a limit which he accepted. The nature of that claim is recognized by concept of equity, it is a special claim, which based on regulation of Bills of exchange Act. The institution which is skillful & formal solution of Bills of exchange Act, is substantially corrected by concept of equity. But it is hard to make clearly the specialty of claim; therefore, it is necessary to expand a variety of bill or a hangover of bill, to strengthen the theory. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。