查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 什麼可以成為歷史證據--近代中國新舊史料觀點的衡突=The Conflict between Old and New Views of Historical Evidence in Early Twentieth-Century China |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 王汎森; | 書刊名 | 新史學 |
卷期 | 8:2 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁次 | 頁93-132 |
分類號 | 650 |
關鍵詞 | 史料; 傅斯年; 陳寅恪; 李濟; Historical data; Fu Ssu-nien; Chen Yin-ko; Li Chi; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文藉著購買明清檔案與殷墟發掘兩件事,來探討傅斯年、陳寅恪、李濟等人所 代表的新史料觀,與深受清儒治學影響的舊史料觀的衝突。作者首先指出,傅斯年等新學者 對舊史家的批評主要有兩點,一是他們對文字資料的迷戀;一是他們的學術往往帶有「骨董 化」的傾向。接著藉新舊學者對明清檔案整理與殷墟考古發掘關注點的不同,勾勒二代學者 史料眼光的不同。對於明清檔案,傅斯年、陳寅恪等寄望能從中發現清代政治實情,羅振玉 等則只看重�堶惘陬L宋版書。對於殷墟發掘,傅斯年、李濟等希望地下能提供「整個的知識 」,舊派學者則仍只關心其中有無甲骨文。藉著當時學術界兩件影響深遠的工作,來點出新 舊學者對史料認知的差距,同時也說明近代中國史學發展的進程。本文的附錄則討論學術文 化上新舊觀點的差別,與政治上中央與地方之緊張的關係。除了明清檔案與殷墟發掘之外, 本文還另外舉了幾個事件為例。 |
英文摘要 | This article demonstrates that in the 1920s, there was a major transition in views of historical evidence. Scholars trained in the West including Hu Shih, Fu Ssu-nien, Ch'en Yin-k'o, and Li Chi were deeply discontent with traditional views of historical evidence, which were, according to them, self-indulgent treatments of purely written data such as texts related to Confucian classics and Sung woodblock prints. Scholars of the new generation, viewed the nature of historical evidence differently. I delved into the archives of the Institute of History and Philology at the Academia Sinica to probe how new views of historical evidence held by Fu Ssu-nien, Ch'en Yin-k'o, and Li Chi, layed a conceptual foundation for Fu's rescue of the Ming-Ch'ing archives in the 1920s and Li Chi's excavation of Shang capital at An-yang in the late 1920s. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。