查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 以中國大陸經濟發展資料(1952-1993)檢驗「剪刀價格」理論=Test of "Price Scissors" theory by using Data Related to Chinese Economic Development |
---|---|
作 者 | 周治邦; | 書刊名 | 中山學術論叢 |
卷 期 | 15 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁 次 | 頁45-75 |
分類號 | 555.1 |
關鍵詞 | 剪刀價格; 農戶承包制; 大躍進運動; 資本積累; Price scissors; Household-responsibility system; Great leap movement; Capital accumulation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 農產品相對工業產品的價格稱為「剪刀價格」。Sah and Stiglitz (1984)設定一 個封閉雙元中央計劃體系模型討論「剪刀價格」問題,並獲(一)降低「剪刀價格」造成資 本累積增加, 及(二)降低「剪刀價格」損害農民及工人福利的兩項推論。 以 1952-1993 年和大陸經濟發展相關的資料檢證上述推論獲得下列結果:首先,第一項推論未獲支持;「 剪刀價格」上升顯著造成平均每勞動力資本積累額增加,因此,最近 40 年來大陸並未犧牲 農民來增加甚資本累積。其次,第二項推論獲得支持;「剪刀價格」以及農戶參與承包制度 比例上升,造成農民消費增加,而「剪刀價格」上升,以及國營企業佔工業產值比重減少, 則造成非農居民消費增加。 |
英文摘要 | The relative price between agricultural and industrial goods is called "price scissors." Sah and Stiglitz (1984) builds a central planning dual economy model to discuss how "price scissors" affects capital accumulation and the welfare of both farmers and industrial workers. They reach two propositions: (1) decreases in "price scissors" increase capital accumulation; and (2) decreases in "price scissors" are detrimental to the welfare of both farmers and industrial workers. We use the data related to China's economic development during 1952-1993 to examine the above propositions, and find that: first, proposition (1) is invalid; capital accumulation per labor force significantly increases as "price scissors" increases. Second, proposition (2) is valid; farmers' consumption increases as both "price scissors" and the ratio of farmers devoted to the house-hold-responsibility system increase, while the consumption of non-farm residents increases as "price scissors" increases or the portion of industrial products produced by the state enterprises decreases. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。