頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 西漢中期對匈奴政策論爭的考察--以「鹽鐵論」為中心的討論=A Study of Han Empire's Policy Toward the Huns as Revealed in the Discourse on Salt and Iron |
---|---|
作 者 | 盧瑞容; | 書刊名 | 宜蘭農工學報 |
卷 期 | 14 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁 次 | 頁137-157 |
分類號 | 622.1 |
關鍵詞 | 鹽鐵論; 王霸之爭; 義利之辨; Discourse on salt and iron; Controversy over enlightened reign and authoritative reign; Distinction between righteousness and profit; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文依據桓寬所整理的《鹽鐵論》,探討「鹽鐵會議」國防政策論辯中,所呈現 的儒家及法家思想特色、以及儒學在西漢中後期後的發展傾向。本文首先論述西漢中期之前 ,漢民族與北方強大的騎馬民族之間的分合恩怨,以及武帝因征伐匈奴而耗空國庫、重建國 庫的經過,以釐清此種國防政策的背景;接著從征伐、示威、守備等三個觀點,分別析論會 議中論辯雙方所顯現的「王霸之爭」之特色;最後並檢討武帝匈奴政策的得失。結論則更進 一步指出;論辯雙方都顯示了武帝以降宮中及民間「獨尊儒術」的教育成果。代表朝廷的桑 弘羊這一邊,大量援引儒家經典為法家政策辯護,顯示了宮中儒學教育的昌盛,及儒術從「 緣飾政治」進而「為政治服務」的現象。而代表民間出席的賢良文學之論調,除了「仁義道 德」之外,也提不出更好的方法,這又顯示出民間儒學教育內涵的一元化傾向。筆者認為這 是「鹽鐵會議」中比經濟、國防、社會統制更重要、更值得吾人深思的學術思想發展史上的 問題。 |
英文摘要 | This paper aims at an analysis of the development of Confucian and Legalist thought as revealed in the debates over salt and iron since the middle period of Western Han. The first part of this paper discusses about the history of constant warfare between the Han Chinese and nomadic people before the middle period of Western Han to investigate the certain national defense policy in this period. The second part analyzes the controversy over the ideal and practice of 'enlightened reign' (Wang Tao) and 'authoritative reign' (Pa Tao) as seen in the debate. Finally the strength and weakness of Emperor Wu's policy toward the Huns are reviewed. The paper reaches the conclusion that both parties involved the debates were all products of Confucian education. This fact attested the result of Emperor Wu's policy of exalting Confucianism as state orthodoxy. Both parties of scholars representing the imperial court and civil society all subscribed to the core values of Confucianism. The overwhelming influence that Confucianism exercised upon every aspect of Han Dynasty can best be observed in this fact. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。