查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國民政府收回香港九龍之決策與交涉(一九四一至一九四八)
- 國民政府收回香港九龍之決策與交涉(一九四一至一九四八)
- 論香港主權歸還後之新局與對我之影響
- Broadcasting in the Process of Sovereignty Transition: The Case of Hong Kong
- 憲兵對「一九九七香港主權轉移」應有的認識
- 主權回歸前後港澳之間的互動
- 從港人價值觀看香港的未來
- 第三十屆PBEC年會紀要系列一:香港九七的變與不變?
- "通識"、"另類現實觀"與社會抗爭--1986香港JWMI潮中辯證及踐行的類幾何學
- 後殖民時代文化焦慮--香港西九龍文娛藝術區發展走向
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國民政府收回香港九龍之決策與交涉(一九四一至一九四八)=Reclaiming Hong Kong and Kowloon the Nationalist Government's Policy Decisions and Negotiations(1941-1948) |
---|---|
作 者 | 李雲漢; | 書刊名 | 故宮學術季刊 |
卷 期 | 14:4 民86.夏 |
頁 次 | 頁25-46+左2-3 |
分類號 | 641.8 |
關鍵詞 | 國民政府; 香港; 九龍; 主權; The Nationalist Government; Hong Kong; Kowloon; Sovereignty; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 國民政府依循中國國民黨第一次全國代表大會制定之對外政策,暨孫中山先生手 訂《建國大綱》抵禦強權修改條約之規定,始終以廢除不平等條約並收回疆土為職志。北伐 統一前後,已獲顯著成就。至抗戰期間獲美、英等國之同意,主動宣布廢除在華治外法權, 重訂平等互惠新約,為害我民族一百年之不平等條約,遂告廢除。所憾者,為香港、九龍之 收回問題,國民政府雖以最強毅之態度出之,終為當時現實環境及整體戰略所羈絆,不能不 期之於戰後。倘戰後無俄軍入侵東北及中共全面稱叛,港、九問題諒可早日解決。本文主旨 ,在依據歷史文獻及當事人證言,論述國民政府於戰時及戰後,為收回香港、九龍所作之決 策及交涉之經過,並兼及美國政府對香港主權問題之立場,為戰時外交之主要環節,亦為國 人所不應遺忘,不容抹煞之史實也。 |
英文摘要 | The Chinese Nationalist Government, adhering to both foreign policy formulated by the KMT's First National Congress, as well as stipulations in Dr. Sun Yat-sen's "Fundamentals of National Reconstruction" to resist foreign power and revise foreign treaties, championed the abolition of unequal treaties and advocated a reclaiming of border regions. The periods both preceding and following the Northward Expedition's unification witnessed notable acheivements in this area. Up until the time that China actually procured English and American agreement during the War of Resisitance, the country not only actively promulgated the abolition of foreign extraterritoriality, but also re-concluded equal, bilateral treaties. Thus the unequal treaties which and plagued the nation for one-hundred years were finally abolished. What is regrettable is that although the National Government remained resolute in its position towards reclaiming Hong Kong and Kowloon, in the end, it could not escape the objective and strategical limits that the era created. The government could only wait until after the war had ended to continue with it's bid for reclamation. Thus, it can be presumed that if, after the war, the Russian army had not invaded China's northest and the Communist Party had not rebelled, the Hong Kong and Kowloon situations might have been resolved at an earlier date. This article, based upon historical documents and official testimonies, discusses both wartime and post-war policies and negotiations that the national government concluded in order to reclaim Hong Kong and Kowloon. It also examines the American government's stance towards Hong Kong's sovereignty and maintains that these two factors not only acted as the critical link in wartime foreign policy, but also became an unforgettable, indellibly truth marking China's history. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。