查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建築物最大空調熱負荷計算法之研究--傳遞函數法、反應係數法及氣象資料分析比較=A Study of Peak Load Calculation Methods of Air Conditioning--The Analysis and Comparison of Transfer Function Method, Response Factor Method and It's Weather Data |
---|---|
作者 | 涂金榮; 林憲德; | 書刊名 | 建築學報 |
卷期 | 21 1997.06[民86.06] |
頁次 | 頁47-58 |
分類號 | 446.6 |
關鍵詞 | 最大空調熱負荷; 傳遞函數法; 反應係數法; Peak load of air conditioning; Transfer function method; Response factor method; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 建築物空調設備之設計,是以"最大空調熱負荷" 來決定機器容量及配管尺寸。在 計算方法上講求以簡單與普及應用又不失精確要求為目標。在氣象資料的採用上則以本土化 為目標。 目前先進國家 (如美、日等 ) 已將艱深的空調熱負荷計算公式,透過理論予以簡 化成經由查表與手算即可求得的方法且已公佈應用多年。本研究即是探討在臺灣廣被採用的 計算方法及其採用的氣象資料,分析比較兩者在臺灣的適用性及優劣點。在計算最大空調熱 負荷的理論上,介紹傳遞函數法與反應係數法;在氣象資料採用上介紹美國 ASHRAE 所公佈 以傳遞函數法計算之氣象資料,及臺灣成功大學林憲德教授所研發以反應係數法所求得之氣 象資料。上述兩種計算方法,經過試算檢驗,結果發現兩者最大空調熱負荷分布趨勢接近, 傳遞函數法在總量上約比反應係數法高出 10% 左右, 顯示兩者計算理論在精確度與信賴性 上已相差無幾,造成誤差之原因是在氣象資料的採用。 |
英文摘要 | In design for cooling of the buildings, the volume and size of plant of air conditioning are always determined by "Peak Load". Concerning the calculation method of peak load, we strive for simple, popular and accurate data and using the local weather data. Using the manipulative formula and existing form, the advanced countries (USA, JAPAN etc.) have already transferred the complex calculation of peak load into a simple formula and applied it several years ago. In this paper, we analyze the fitness and good or bad points of those methods and its weather data which were widely applied in Taiwan. About the calculation method of the peak load, we introduce the Transfer Function Method and the Response Factor Method. According to the results of simulation, we find out the trend of the distribution of those two methods are very close. The total amount of the former method is 10% higher than the latter. It appears that the accuracy and reliance of those two methods are almost the same. And the reason causing the difference between them is just the application of weather data. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。