查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺海兩岸憲政發展之比較=Comparison of the Constitutions Across the Taiwan Straits |
---|---|
作者 | 蔡熊山; | 書刊名 | 通識教育季刊 |
卷期 | 4:2 民86.06 |
頁次 | 頁33-57 |
分類號 | 571.6 |
關鍵詞 | 中華民國憲法; 中華人民共和國憲法; 議行合一制; 民主集中制; The constitution of the Republic of China; The constitution of the People's Republic of China; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 兩岸因政治理念不同致隔海分治,這種差異導致兩岸憲政經驗的不同,欲了解兩岸 憲政體制的異同,就必須從憲法施行的沿革,憲法的概念、內容和結構來比較。 中華民國的憲政經驗是重法治,而法制待確立;而中共則是重法制,而少法治,這是兩岸憲政 體制的最大差異。因此,兩岸在尋求國家整合或解決相互交往問題的過程中,必須要使憲法發 揮規範的作用,而這個目標就有賴各政黨間對彼此的政治理念包容,化異求同,方能達成法治 憲政的目標。 |
英文摘要 | Because of the different political ideas, each side across the Taiwan Straits has been under separate governments. This difference has caused distinctly different constitutionalism. In order to compare the constitutionalism on both sides of the Straits, different attributes: the process of the constitution implementation, the constitution overview, the content and the structures are studied. The constitutional experiences of the Republic of China(ROC) emphasizes law-ruling and yet the constitutional system is not completely established; whereas the system on the Communist China's side emphasizes the law-ruling and yet rarely follows the law. This is the biggest difference between the two constitutions. Therefore, when seeking the country's unification and solving the problems during the interactions between the two sides, the constitutionalism must function properly. And the success relies on the understanding, compromise, negotiations of the various political ideologies in order to reach the constitutionalism. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。