查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 有關北伐時期蘇俄軍事專家角色=The Northern March and the Soviet Union's Position: Perspective of Russian Scholar |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | Miasnikov,Vladimir S.; | 書刊名 | 中華軍史學會會刊 |
卷期 | 2 1997.05[民86.05] |
頁次 | 頁529-578 |
專輯 | 紀念北伐七十週年專號 |
分類號 | 591.27 |
關鍵詞 | 北伐時期; 蘇俄; 軍事顧問; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese);英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本週年紀念專題討論會將有助於我們結合已知與新的資訊,進而再次分析北伐的過程,以及蘇俄代表們在其間所扮演的角色。 1926年7月1日,國民政府發布「北伐宣言」。無論是不同階級 勢力所採取的態度,或者是聯合戰線中各政黨、團體所作的考量,北伐的性質,即中國人民反對北洋軍閥的民族自由之戰。 然而,俄國顧問們卻有不同的意見。米哈依爾‧鮑羅廷即曾多次強調:「僅以處罰軍閥和建立一個誠信的政府為唯一目的,而征戰至北方是相當荒謬的」。 加侖的戰略計畫準備採各個擊破的方式,將國民革命軍的主要敵人一一殲滅,首先是吳佩孚,接著就是孫傳芳。為此,加倫和他的蘇俄軍事顧問團團員擬定了整套的軍事作戰計畫。該項計畫,從打敗吳佩孚開始,直到打倒所有軍閥、解放全中國,都涵蓋其中。 |
英文摘要 | This jubilee symposium enables us to combine the known and the new information and thus once again to analyze the course of the Northern March and the role of Soviet representatives therein. On July 1, 1926 the National government published the manifesto on the Northern March. Whatever were the attitudes. taken by various class forces, or calculations, made by political parties and groups within the united front, the Northern March acquired the character of the Chinese people’s war of national liberation against the militarists in the north. The Russian advisors had different opinions. Michael Borodin who emphasized several times that "it would be ridiculous to march to the North with the only purpose to punish militarists and establish honest government". Blyukher’s strategic plan was exactly to defeat the PRA’s main adversaries one by one, Wu Peifu first and Sun Chuanfang second. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。