查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 臺美日企業在臺灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究
- 臺商國際經營績效之相關因素分析--以赴大陸及東南亞諸國投資為例
- 大陸臺商人力資源管理優勢化策略探討
- 我國高科技產業在動盪經營環境下之策略探討
- 不同績效的廠商在外部環境、研發策略及企業文化等構面之探討--以獲有環保標章之廠商為例
- Business Environment, Management Objective, Quality Management, and Competitive Strategy: An Empirical Investigation
- Relationships between Corporate Culture, Organizational Structure, Management Style and Business Performance: A Comparative Study of American, Japanese and Taiwanese Firms
- 企業環境、競爭策略與品管資訊對經營績效之影響
- 市場導向之企業文化根源的探討
- 醫學中心組織文化、管理模式、競爭優勢與經營績效之互動相關影響研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 臺美日企業在臺灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究=A Study of Management Environments and Competitive Strategies for Taiwanese, American and Japanese Firms in Taiwan and Mainlan |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳萬益; 吳志正; | 書刊名 | 臺大管理論叢 |
卷期 | 7:1 1996.02[民85.02] |
頁次 | 頁49-83 |
分類號 | 553.97 |
關鍵詞 | 經營環境; 競爭優勢; 企業文化; 競爭策略; 經營績效; Management environment; Competitive advantage; Corporate culture; Competitive strategy; Management performance; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 自政府開放廠商經由間接方式赴大陸投資以來,臺商以極迅速的腳步悄悄登上大陸,在完全陌生的環境中,面對著生活在共產主義、吃大鍋飯長大的大陸員工,必須摸索其特定之管理上的技巧與生存法則?而在模糊不清、處處受限的經營環境中,臺商如何擬定其競爭策略?經營績效是否有所增進?這些都是我們急欲獲知的答案。 透過兩岸臺美日資企業經營者的實地訪談及問卷調查,本研究之結論如下:一、就臺灣地區的製造業而言,臺資企業團隊精神佳,美資企業具有冒險犯難精神,日資企業極注重製程效率策略,但臺美日企業的經營績效沒有顯著的差別。 二、就大陸地區的製造業而言,臺資企業具「中庸型」的領導風格,美資企業具有低風險規避傾向的領導風格,日資企業具「理想型」領導風格、重視製程效率策略、生產力高。 三、在臺灣及大陸地區之企業,臺美日企業採行的競爭策略和產業環境、競爭優勢、企業文化、管理風格之間皆有顯著的相關。臺美日企業的經營績效和產業環境、競爭優勢、企業文化、管理風格、經營策略之間也都有顯著的相關。 |
英文摘要 | Since the permission of indirect investment on Mainland China, many companies in Taiwan have entered into Mainland markets with very fast pace. These companies, facing upon employees living in a communist environment, with a common perception of “chi-ta-kao-fan(吃大鍋飯)”, have to identify their own specific management skills and survival strategies. Through a series of field survey and questionnaire survey among Taiwanese, American, and Japanese firms, this study concludes the following results: 1.For those manufacturing firms in Taiwan, Taiwanese enterprises tend to emphasize teamwor5k and team spirits. American firms tend to have higher risk taking leadership behaviors. Japanese firms tend to emphasize manufacturing efficinecy strategies. However, these three kinds of firms do not show significant differences on management performances. 2.For those manufacturing firms in Mainland China, Taiwanese firms tend to adopt moderate (中庸) leadership behaviors. American firms tend to have higher risking taking leadership behaviors, Japanese firms tend to emphasize manufacturing efficiency strategies and have higher productivity. 3.For Taiwanese, American, and Japanese firms operating in both Taiwan and Mainland China, their selection of competitive strategies tend to be highly related to industrial environments, competitive advantages, corporate culture and management styles. The firm’s management performances also tend to be highly related to industrial environment, competitive advantages, corporate culture, management styles, and competitive strategies. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。