頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 劉知幾鄭樵章學誠的史學理論及其比較=A Comparative Study on the Historiographical Theory: Liu Chih-Chi, Cheng Chiao and Chang Huseh-Ch'eng |
---|---|
作者 | 林時民; Lin, Shih Min; |
期刊 | 國立中興大學臺中夜間部學報 |
出版日期 | 19961100 |
卷期 | 2 1996.11[民85.11] |
頁次 | 頁201-222 |
分類號 | 610.81 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 史通; 通志; 文史通義; 史才論; Shih-t'ung; Generalities on history; Tung-chih; General treatise; Wenshih tung-i; General meaning of historiography; |
中文摘要 | 本文針對唐代劉知幾、宋代鄭樵、清代章學誠三位異代史家對傳統史學技藝 與形式之相關言論與主張,提出「三長說」「史文說」以抉發敘論之。就「三長 說」而言,劉氏首倡史才史學史識,以得「識」最要最難。鄭氏並未續倡此說, 僅稱譽司馬遷與劉知幾馬二良史,其論據顯受劉氏所影響。章氏則神說史德,並 以三長結合事、文、義及義理、辭章、徵實,賦與三長說新內涵。就後者「史文 說」言,則三氏一致反對文士撰史,劉氏其理在文士無「銓綜之識」,章氏則曰 撰史須「陶鑄成文」,文士不可企及。至於操觚之道,劉主直書實錄,章則「史 文屈曲而適如其事」,鄭氏所論則未逮兩氏深刻。 |
英文摘要 | This paper is devided into two parts, continuously to describe and analyze "the theory of historian's caraft" and "the theory of historical wrintings" representing advocating and different views for types of literary works proposed by three important hisorians in chinese traditional historiographical history, namely Chih-Chi Liu, Chiao Cheng and Hsueh- ch'eng Chang. From the point view of the former theory, Liu presented the concept of three Kinds of historian's craft, which influenced the two later authors of the Tung-chih ( General Treatise) in the Sung dynasty and the Wen-shih tung-i (General Meaning of Historiography) in the Ching dynasty, but was improved into another good sytles in the Wen- shih tung-i by Chang. From the viewpoint of the latter theory, three historians obviously of ferred opposition to that the literary man could not write the history one and all. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。