頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 論勞動基準法上之「勞工」(以經理人為檢討重點)--評釋臺北地方法院八十三度勞訴字第四號判決=Issue the Difinition of "The Labor" on Labor Standard Law |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 劉志鵬; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會研究季刊 |
| 卷 期 | 24 1996.11[民85.11] |
| 頁 次 | 頁79-108 |
| 專 輯 | 勞工研究專題 |
| 分類號 | 556.84 |
| 關鍵詞 | 勞工; 雇工; 勞動基準法; 經理人; Labors; Employers; Labor standard law; Managers; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 勞基法之適用對象限於與雇主訂立勞動契約之「勞工」,但勞工之定義如何?在具體案例中如何界定判斷「勞工」之標準?我國迄今尚鮮有文獻探討。本文以臺北地方法院一 則有關經理人是否為勞工之判決為評釋對象,援引日本學者、實務見解,並比較我國現有文獻,嘗識在我國法制下建立判斷「勞工」之標準。 |
| 英文摘要 | Labor standard Law applys to labors who contract with employers only, but what's the definition of "the labor"? How do we define "the labor" in substantial cases ? Those are scarcely discussed in R.O.C. The issue focuses on the judgement of Taipei district Court concerning about if the manager should be regard as the labor, and confer the views of Japan scholars and cases, comparing with native issues, trying to establish the standard of defining "the labor" under the national law strucure. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。