查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 市場競爭規範適用於廣播電視領域的理論基礎--德國法學界逾十載「卡特爾法」與「廣電法」論戰的啟示=The Competition Law in the Regulation Field of Broadcasting Laws--The Continuous Debates in Germany |
---|---|
作 者 | 石世豪; | 書刊名 | 新聞學研究 |
卷 期 | 53 1996.07[民85.07] |
頁 次 | 頁161-189 |
分類號 | 557.76 |
關鍵詞 | 文化財; 市場; 基本供給; 競爭規範; 權限劃分; Cultural property; Market; Grundrechte competence; The competition law; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 廣電事業彼此間在市場上的競爭與合作關係,是否應該一體適用市場競爭法規(在我國則為公平交易法),德國法學界曾有過激烈的爭辯。兩大法域中的法學者除了各自標舉本身的法律思想、批評對方干擾市場運作(廣電管制)或侵蝕廣電憲章(市場化)之外,也分別從基本法上關於權力分立、基本權保障等觀點,嘗試提出劃分兩大法域界限,或甚至調和兩大法域的具體辦法。其中以功能的觀點,試圖提升基本權保障最適狀態的理論,最值得國內相關法制建構的參考。 |
英文摘要 | After the German 'Lander' licensed the commercial broadcasters in their territories, the Federal Cartel Agency (Bundeskartellamt) gained consequently its competence over the new broadcasters and tried -- which the experts of broadcasting laws strongly criticized -- to constrain the established public broadcasters into the same competition model. Since the public broadcasters have obeyed for years rules according to the principle of coordination and integration, it's no wonder that the expansions of these 'market giants' were steadily warned and eventually forbidden. The experts of the (federal) competition law and those of the broadcasting laws (of the 'Lander') have developed several theories to resolve the competence disputes problem. Among them the functional approach of the optimal guarantee for 'grundrechte' is especially interesting for readers in Taiwan. The formal approach, on the other hand, is based on the long standing tradition of German legal dogmatics. Therefore it should not be hastily adopted in another country without critical analysis of the cultural differences in between. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。