查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 資訊社會中公共行政的新議題=Information Society: New Issues in Public Administration |
---|---|
作 者 | 盧建旭; | 書刊名 | 政治科學論叢 |
卷 期 | 7 1996.06[民85.06] |
頁 次 | 頁231-256 |
分類號 | 572.9 |
關鍵詞 | 資訊社會; 公共行政; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 資訊社會的來臨已對人類生活與思考產生整體性的影響。問題是在這不同於工業社會的資訊數位式社會生活中,作為執行國家意志的公共行政將如何來因應公共目的變遷?雖然社會科學各科的學者對資訊社會概念的建構已有一段時日,但從美國公共行政學的回顧與趨勢整理之中,找不出對資訊社會的因應與理論研究。公共行政學界對於此具未來性的相關議題並未重視,仍以歷史性的思考與行動應付著未來的變遷。唯一例外是Cleveland(1985)曾對資訊對社會到來後,對工業社會中公共行政所立基的五種層級管理的挑戰,做過猜臆性質的觀察與描述。但Cleveland僅提出猜臆方向後並未再積極探究,迄今需要做延伸與補充。 本文目的僅在於提出公共行政學如何因應資訊社會變遷的不同議題。全文概分四大部分。第一、以描述性介紹資訊社會的定義與特性,比對出與工業社會的不同之處。第二、從以往公共行政學理論趨勢與整理中,顯示出對資訊社會概念的忽視。第三、簡述Cleveland(1985)對五種公共行政傳統的層級:權力、決策、社會階級、公平性、主權國家,因應資訊社會的可能轉變所作之猜測。第四、對未來的研究議題提出整體性的方向,並建議對未來理論架構的建立的需要性。 |
英文摘要 | The arrival of information society lead great impacts on human life and thinking. A problem is that, unlike past industrial society, information digitalized society inevitably forces public administration to cope with new changes in public purposes. Although social scientists have constructed a complete set of concepts concerning with information society, there are no enough related studies in American public administration literature. Theorists in public administration show less concern about this very topic area, while practitioners are applying past rationalization and action to deal with change. One exception is that Cleveland (1985) not only described the arrival of information society, but also forectast the possible changes of five hierachical forms in public administration. However, Cleveland simply proposed his conjecture without making implications. Further researches are imperative. The paper is to call for the new issues regarding how public administration encounters the changed in information society. The paper consists of four major sections. First, the author describes the definition and attribute of information society and tells the differences from those of industrial society. Second, an emphasis is made to present the past negligence about the concepts of information society in the literature of public administration. Third, a summary of Cleveland's (1985) conjecture of five hierarchical forms of public administration tradition is briefed: power decision making, social class, equity, and sovereignty. Fourth, the author will propose a research scope for future study and emphasize the need for a theoretical framework. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。