查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 張爾岐對「儀禮」之獨特見解 |
---|---|
作 者 | 韓碧琴; | 書刊名 | 國立中興大學臺中夜間部學報 |
卷 期 | 1 1995.11[民84.11] |
頁 次 | 頁27-49 |
分類號 | 094.2 |
關鍵詞 | 張爾岐; 賈疏; 鄭註; 儀禮鄭註句讀; Chang Ehr-chi; Chia's explication; Cheng's commentary; Pause of cheng's commentary of I-Li; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 儀禮一書自韓昌黎已嗟其難,蓋其書未分章節句讀,難以明於詁訓,詳其節目, 以觀會通;且鄭註古質,賈疏冗漫,皆不易了讀。清濟陽張爾岐取儀禮唐石經、明監本,互 讎之,刊誤辨疑,章分節解,定其句讀;全錄鄭註,精擇賈疏,於段後標目,或附以己說, 成儀禮鄭註句讀。 張爾岐蓋以章句之儒自居,謙也。張氏針對鄭註賈疏質疑發明,所見頗有確不可易者,且多 前人所未發;後之學者因其句讀以明其文,因文以識其義,因其義以通禮容制度;誠禮學津 梁寶筏也。斯文之作,旨在將張爾岐禮學之獨特見解,前人所未發者,則臚陳諸說,以俟博 雅。 張氏為時代所囿,資料殘缺寡少,論說難免失於謬誤,然瑕不掩瑜,其書堪稱治儀禮者最佳 入門之書,清胡德琳謂其書為「鄭氏之功臣,學者之津筏。」誠非過譽。 |
英文摘要 | The book I-Li is hard to read not only because of the ancient-style commentary by Cheng Hsuan and the redundant explication by Chia Kung-Yen but also no pauses in whole test. Chang Ehr-Chi, a Ching Dynasty scholar, used Tang Dynasty and Ming Dynasty reference books to revise I-Li, He devided the whole book into charpters and passages, made pasuses of sentences in whole classical text, Chang's commentary and part of Chia's explication, added his own oppinions, and named the book as Pause of Cheng's commentary of I-Li. Some of Chang's oppinions on Cheng and Chia's doubtful commentary and some of his own views were correct and helpful for following scholar to study I-Li. However, because of the seperation of time and the deficiency of reference, some of Chang's oppinions might be uncorrect. The purpose of this study was to review and analyse Chang's views on the classic text, Cheng's commentary, Chia's explication and his original comments by referencing recently unearthed material and published articles. Some of Chang's views were proved to be uncorrect in this study. However Chang's book is still excellent and necessary for studying I-Li |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。