查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 聽覺障礙學生分數減法演算歷程之診斷分析=A Cognitive Analysis of Diagnosing Process of Fraction Substraction in Hearing-Impaired Students |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃桂君; | 書刊名 | 特殊教育研究學刊 |
卷 期 | 13 1995.12[民84.12] |
頁 次 | 頁27-44 |
分類號 | 529.67 |
關鍵詞 | 聽覺障礙學生; 分數減法; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究在透過分數減法演算歷程的作結構分析,編製「分數減法診斷測驗」,同時採用結構性反應觀察表可,建立分數減法演算歷程診斷分析模式並檢驗瑯殺性,以比較聽障學生與普通學生分數減法演算歷程之差異。本研究以581名聽覺障礙覺學生與746普通學生為研究對象,施測所得資料先進行心理計量分析,再以集群分析法診斷學生能力。其中,心理計量分析包括:運用Rasch模式與線性logistic模式進行題目參數、試容成份參數、能力值、內適合度與外適合度的估計。 本研究主要的發現為: 1.聽障組與普通組學生在「成份組型」與「能力值與內外適合度」兩項分數減法演算歷程之診斷分析模式中,均以「成份組型診斷分析模式」較能有效地歸類學生能力所屬的「認知狀態」。 2.本研究經由作結構分析與線性logistic模式的試題內容成份參數分析,得以周全地分解演算「分數減法」所需的試題內容成份,並詮釋了各成份結構間的關係。試題成份模式四的成份分析較能突釋聽障組與普通組學生難度的變異。 3.聽障組與普通組學生在各試題內容成儀難度值的估計值均大於普通組,從試題內容成份參數間的變異,可反映出學生能力差異的狀況。 |
英文摘要 | "Fraction Substraction Diagnostic Test (FSDT)" was designed to develop cognitively diagnostic model which could effectively analyze item responses, It was further used to compare the item responses from the hearing-impaired (HI) students with those from the non-handicapped (NH) students. Total of 1327 subjects, 581 HI students and 746 NH students, were included in this study. The data was analyzed to estimate item parameters, the elementary components parameters, ability value, infit value and outfit value by using the Rasch model (RM) and linear logistic model (LLTM). The cognitive states were than diagnosed with the cluster analysis. The major findings of the study were as follows: 1. The "Attribute Pattern Model" was found to be more effective than "Ability and Fit Value Model" to diagnose the cognitive states of fraction substraction in both groups. 2. The task analysis and LLTM could successfully decompose the elementary components of fraction substraction and explain the relationships between the components. The elementary component model IV with higher correlations between item difficultes by using R and LLTM could bette explain the variation of item difficulty in two groups. 3. The values of elementary component parameters reflected differences between both groups. Those in HI group is higher than NH group. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。