查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 全球經濟變遷、發展型國家與臺灣城鄉規劃之重探:都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機
- 城鄉發展與規劃有關英文期刑介評
- 發展型「國家」或發展型國家「理論」的終結﹖
- 從全球城市概念論上海的再起與轉型
- 從「活化文化資產」到「城鄉生命重現」21世紀城鄉規劃發展之新思維
- 全球化發展與臺灣行政區劃再結構
- 鄉村觀光永續發展的景觀策略研議
- Political Institutions and Economic Governance: The Political Economy of Hybrid Presidentialism in Postauthoritarian Taiwan
- Economic Development and Political Democratization Reconsidered
- 東亞發展型國家--模範或特例?
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 全球經濟變遷、發展型國家與臺灣城鄉規劃之重探:都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機=Global Shifts, Developmental State and the Town-Rural Planning Revisited in Taiwan: A Geographic Enquiry and Governance Crisis for the Adaptation of Urban Entrepreneurialism |
---|---|
作 者 | 李永展; 藍逸之; 莊翰華; | 書刊名 | 地理學報 |
卷 期 | 40 民94.06 |
頁 次 | 頁69-97 |
分類號 | 545.5 |
關鍵詞 | 城鄉規劃; 都市企業主義; 發展型國家; 空間極化; 彈性積累; Town-rural planning; Urban entrepreneurialism; Developmental state; Spatial polarization; Flexible accumulation; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 根據臺灣戰後的空間發展經驗來看,城鄉失衡與空間極化一直是極為嚴重的問題:如今,在面臨全球化的影響下,這種悄況將有更進一步深化的趨勢。同時,國家自從進入1990年代以後,為了回應全球經濟的挑戰,在都市發展策略上亦看似步入了「都市企業主義」取向的做法。然而,臺灣的規劃當局在引用這種提法的同時,卻忽略了發展型國家的背景與西方先進資本主義都市經驗的差異。所以,本文站在都市企業主義的觀點下,嘗試說明西方都市企業主義的意義與背景。其次,討論發展型國家的都市過程與不均等發展現象。再者,闡釋臺灣的發展型國家意識形態如何結合全球經濟脈絡,以及造成的空間極化結果。最後,則批判採霰都市企業主義的提法,在未意識到發展掛帥所造成的問題根源之時,對於臺灣當前的城鄉發展產一的論述矛盾及可能危機。 |
英文摘要 | The experience of spatial development in Taiwan during the postwar era suggests that the most serious problems are the urban-rural uneven development and spatial polarization. The problems have now become even worse owing to the impact of economic globalization. Meanwhile, the state, in order to respond to the challenges within global economy, has adapted to some narratives from “urban entrepreneurial” for the urban development strategies since the 1990s. The planning authorities, however, have dramatically neglected the differences between developmental state and West-Atlantic urban experience. This essay attempts to make sense of the concept and background from the perspective of urban entrepreneurialism. We then discuss the urban process under a developmental state ideology and its consequent uneven development. We also try to explain how the developmental state ideology functions within the context of global economy and its hazardous effect of spatial polarization. Finally, we criticize the discourse paradox and possible crisis in Taiwan’s urban-rural development if the planning authori9ties adapt entrepreneurial narratives without an awareness of the problem origins created from the developmentalist. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。