頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 美國反托拉斯立法目標的研究 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 莊春發; | 書刊名 | 經濟研究. 臺北大學經濟學系 |
| 卷 期 | 33:2 1995.06[民84.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁71-101 |
| 分類號 | 553.74 |
| 關鍵詞 | 美國; 反托拉斯; 立法; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 經濟效率是竑托拉斯立法的中心目標,但其他社會與政治的非經濟目標也屬於立法目標之一,在學界似乎已取得共識。反托拉斯立斯的保護法益,是以配置效率為主時以消費者福利為對象,實務上則仍未有一致的結論。即使同意以經率為主目標,反托拉斯立法保護的法益,仍有短期配置效率目標,和長期生產效率目標的爭議。 配置效率與消費者福利目標的爭論,造成相同的企業行為,如合併,用不同標準衡量,將有合法與不合法的顯著差異結果。同樣的,短期與長期不同目標的爭論,則影響反托拉斯執法的方向。 |
| 英文摘要 | Achieveing economic efficiency is one of the central goals of antitrust legislations. On the other hand social and political, noneconomics goals are also part of the legislative consideration. Antitrust scholars already reach the consencus on this. However, whether the benefit protected by the antirust law is allocative efficiency or is the consumer welfare, antitrust experiences have not yet reached any consensus. Although everyone agrees that achieveing economic efficiency is the main purpose of antitrust legislations, the debate whether the purpose pursued is short-run allocative efficiency or long-run production efficiency remains. The argument regarding the purpose of antiturust legislations might cause the similar behaviors, for instance merger cases, be treated differently i.e, may sometimes be held illegal and sometimes legal just because of applying different standards to the cases. And similary, the short-run and the long-run debate of antitrust goals also effect the direction of the antitrust enforcement. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。